Mongillo19
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,703
Im being serious when I say I'm surprised there hasn't at least been an "update" recently. They were pretty good doing a monthly one even if there was nothing to report on. Going on 2 months now
It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.Im being serious when I say I'm surprised there hasn't at least been an "update" recently. They were pretty good doing a monthly one even if there was nothing to report on. Going on 2 months now
Yeah that's the only way they can pull it back but I'm skeptical.It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.
It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.
There’s a roadmap?
![]()
I agree with you - I may love my QC but that doesn't mean I agree with their business practices. That being said I really don't have a loyalty to any digital brand out there - the next modeler I get may just be FAS if it's the right form factor for me.Well, here's the thing: If you don't want to "timeline promise", maybe don't publish a public Wiki page with what PCOM releases are coming for each of the next three firmwares?!?
Hell, at that point, just go ahead and share your dev team's roadmap as an update. This is all pie in the sky, anyway, right?
The only reason I don't think they will is the timing would be shit - AFTER they have their anniversary sale. Unless they were really trying to make that cut but couldn't release it on time.Based on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Yeah but the thing with the NC update, while awesome, it didn't add anything the QC doesn't have. It's not like the reinvented the wheel. I imagine they used a good chunk of resources they already had for the QC devicesBased on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Based on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Last friday I had a gig in a medium auditorium (600 audience or so). I´m just posting to share some thoughts.
My buddy (lead guitar) used his Quad Cortex. I used my Nano Cortex. Both direct to PA and monitored through wedges provided by the venue.
It was Ok. Perfectly fine. BUT:
- He has some trebly presets (because it´s mandatory for the sounds he needs, since We´re a tribute band and the original sound is that way). With those presets, ""FRFR"" monitor always struggle in the high frequencies, were tweeters start to make strange things... it´s like them resonating or squealing or feedbacking in a way a 12" speaker never does. With IEMS he doesn´t have the problem, so the QC is not guilty, but ""FRFR"" monitors.
- Even when everything was OK, it´s just not the same feeling as having a guitar cab behind you. The tone is there... I wouldn´t dare to say anyone that I´m able to notice sound differences. I most surely don´t. But there´s something that I just dig more with a traditional cab. Same old discussion, I know. Just wanted to share that gig experience.
Agree, except for that point about how “they’d love to sprinkle some new plugins but…” Giving plugins top priority because they generate revenue is exactly the path NDSP takes 9x out of 10, even when they’ve got unfulfilled promises to QC owners hanging over their heads.Best I can divine about their developmental priorities (in order of importance to NDSP):
I'm sure they'd love to sprinkle some new plugins to help the ole' coffers out too, but they're obviously stretched thin development-wise.
- "X'-ize the 10 remaining plugins on the old architecture. Get hype videos and new presets ready to make people care.
- PCOM those and the 6 remaining X plugins not converted. Going by the current rate of 6-7 months for every two converted, well......best not to think about it.
- Port QC features to Nano Cortex.
- .................
As a QC owner, you gotta be good with the unit as it is now+cloud captures, paywalled DLC or just crumbs 1-2 times a year.
Agree, except for that point about how “they’d love to sprinkle some new plugins but…” Giving plugins top priority because they generate revenue is exactly the path NDSP takes 9x out of 10, even when they’ve got unfulfilled promises to QC owners hanging over their heads.
They might also see that the amp sim plugin market is pretty saturated as is. Updating their existing plugins can bring new interest for those.Oh, I know they always err on the side of revenue streams. I just haven't seen a new plugin from them for quite awhile.
Morgan Amps suite was the last in Christmas of 2023. That's right around the time that QC development started to slow to a crawl too. 2024 was basically a firmware gap year, and 2025 has been sparse too.
So, Occam's Razor suggests that if a company known for milking their customers goes that long without any additional revenue streams - Nano Cortex release excepted - it's not because they wanted to. They seem to genuinely lack development bandwidth, so they're robbing Peter to pay Paul, so to speak.
I guess you're right. My impressions were skewed because every time I get an email from them, and it's to do with plugins as opposed to QC firmware, I feel that millisecond of dopamine drip, then get mildly annoyed. But now that I think about it, most (all?) of those recent emails concerning plugin development were about "X" updates, not new amps or artists.Morgan Amps suite was the last in Christmas of 2023. That's right around the time that QC development started to slow to a crawl too.