Mongillo19
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,703
Im being serious when I say I'm surprised there hasn't at least been an "update" recently. They were pretty good doing a monthly one even if there was nothing to report on. Going on 2 months now
It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.Im being serious when I say I'm surprised there hasn't at least been an "update" recently. They were pretty good doing a monthly one even if there was nothing to report on. Going on 2 months now
Yeah that's the only way they can pull it back but I'm skeptical.It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.
It is strange, and that update in March felt like "ok guys it's been 4 months, here's a crumb". It makes me ignorantly hopeful that when they come back with something it'll be bigger than what was expected. I know I'll be disappointed. I think they're afraid to make any sort of timeline promise given their history.
There’s a roadmap?
![]()
I agree with you - I may love my QC but that doesn't mean I agree with their business practices. That being said I really don't have a loyalty to any digital brand out there - the next modeler I get may just be FAS if it's the right form factor for me.Well, here's the thing: If you don't want to "timeline promise", maybe don't publish a public Wiki page with what PCOM releases are coming for each of the next three firmwares?!?
Hell, at that point, just go ahead and share your dev team's roadmap as an update. This is all pie in the sky, anyway, right?
The only reason I don't think they will is the timing would be shit - AFTER they have their anniversary sale. Unless they were really trying to make that cut but couldn't release it on time.Based on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Yeah but the thing with the NC update, while awesome, it didn't add anything the QC doesn't have. It's not like the reinvented the wheel. I imagine they used a good chunk of resources they already had for the QC devicesBased on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Based on what they just did for Nano I might be optimistic but I think they might release a massive update For QC in the next month or 2
Last friday I had a gig in a medium auditorium (600 audience or so). I´m just posting to share some thoughts.
My buddy (lead guitar) used his Quad Cortex. I used my Nano Cortex. Both direct to PA and monitored through wedges provided by the venue.
It was Ok. Perfectly fine. BUT:
- He has some trebly presets (because it´s mandatory for the sounds he needs, since We´re a tribute band and the original sound is that way). With those presets, ""FRFR"" monitor always struggle in the high frequencies, were tweeters start to make strange things... it´s like them resonating or squealing or feedbacking in a way a 12" speaker never does. With IEMS he doesn´t have the problem, so the QC is not guilty, but ""FRFR"" monitors.
- Even when everything was OK, it´s just not the same feeling as having a guitar cab behind you. The tone is there... I wouldn´t dare to say anyone that I´m able to notice sound differences. I most surely don´t. But there´s something that I just dig more with a traditional cab. Same old discussion, I know. Just wanted to share that gig experience.