NDSP Quad Cortex
- Thread starter Jarick
- Start date
What the actual...!
Few have camped harder for them and been a better sport when they get some static for their lesser decisions.
Good for you, man.
namathan_zirwir
Roadie
- Messages
- 161
I’m assuming that TINA was a part of the V2 capturing development
MirrorProfiles
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,800
Just seen a clip on Facebook of someone playing a MIDI keyboard through a synth on the QC. Synth sounds are fairly run of the mill but it honestly seems pretty fucking awesome to be able to do that, IMO.
- Messages
- 7,176
- Messages
- 7,176
The Revv sounds good, but as usual it's a folder of 20 captures I can scarcely tell apart. With no meaningful naming convention to distinguish.
Same with the Dover DA-50, which is even more baffling, since that's more of an all-rounder.
Vic Winters
Roadie
- Messages
- 284
- Messages
- 1,313
Neural also updated these captures to the cloud for Nano users and from there you can see all the detail. For instance, this is Revv 14.
Obviously not as ideal as just seeing it on the QC though.
- Messages
- 7,176
Thanks! I rarely get on the website, and I always forget that information is there.
- Messages
- 7,176
Seanhanlonguitar
Newbie
- Messages
- 7
Played with the update today for a while. I think it finally brings the QC into the same league as the big boys. Still a fractal fanboy at heart, but this update is great, and the form factor still is king in my book
Okay, I’ve been hating on Neural for a long time (despite owning a QC) and I feel it was warranted, but this is a pretty incredible update. The timing with the Stadium release is interesting. From preliminary stuff I’ve seen/heard it may have just jumped up with Tonex V2 and NAM, or maybe even better? crazy. The ability to (finally) accurately capture fuzz and compressors is very intriguing too, but I haven’t heard enough to know if that’s just marketing hype or not yet
- Messages
- 6,793
Listening to the GuitarJon video, it just seems like the cloud approach is going to inevitably beat any onboard solution by fact that there will always be way more compute available via that method.
It makes me wonder if any onboard capture process will ever a long half-life. Also makes me wonder, if it would ever be possible to “store” the initial capture and then have the ability to reproduce a new/improved version of it when the cloud based method gets updated or improved over time.
I don’t know enough about NAM, but if it’s open source, I’d be curious if Neural (or anyone for that matter) isn’t to some degree retrofitting it, or how much of this new process is truly novel. Not that it matters much if you’re a QC owner, but I would be curious if this isn’t to some degree a NAM variant in its approach.
Does anyone know if Tonex is using a NAM-like process or is their Cloud approach wholly different?
It makes me wonder if any onboard capture process will ever a long half-life. Also makes me wonder, if it would ever be possible to “store” the initial capture and then have the ability to reproduce a new/improved version of it when the cloud based method gets updated or improved over time.
I don’t know enough about NAM, but if it’s open source, I’d be curious if Neural (or anyone for that matter) isn’t to some degree retrofitting it, or how much of this new process is truly novel. Not that it matters much if you’re a QC owner, but I would be curious if this isn’t to some degree a NAM variant in its approach.
Does anyone know if Tonex is using a NAM-like process or is their Cloud approach wholly different?
Last edited:
