NAM support announced by Fractal Audio

The biggest issue with NAM is how resource intensive it is which is why there are no cheap native players. Tonex solved that, and I am sure Proxy will address it as well, but also through proprietary software. For Fractal, if their next gen machines will already have the horsepower, it makes sense to let it run NAM, and for a small company, it makes sense not to try to develop their own capture tech.
I hadn't really considered it before, but I do wonder if Line 6 will get involved in that market at all with Proxy. PodExpress style pedal with NAM quality captures and a handful of Line6 effects would be a surefire winner. I think FX are something that Line 6 arguably has a lead over IK on, at least as far as FX that run on dedicated HW.
 
I think Line6 has a lead on IK in effects, UI and UE. The question would be can they make Proxy and their effects efficient enough to run on a device they can sell at a Tonex One price point or atleast the ball park. If they can, I could see it selling well.
 
Agreed 100%. It takes a lot of tweaking to get models to sound like amps.
Is this really the case for most people? Models sound like amps. They don’t sound like a picture perfect tone without tweaking. Just like amps. I can grab the lowly Boss GX100, load an amp model, and it sounds like an amp through a cab and a microphone. Usually turn a few knobs for 20 seconds and it sounds more than useable in a performance context, a couple more turns and it’s closer to a recording tone. Amps don’t just sound perfect when you stick a mic in front of it because it’s an amp. And NAM captures might sound better, might sound worse, than the “I just loaded an amp model” depending on who made it, what they used, etc etc etc. I think people who are fighting with modelers to sound “more amp like” in 2025 are either using the wrong output method for their desired result, or they’re after some imaginary perfect tone that doesn’t exist in the real world without a keen ear tweaking it either.
 
Agreed 100%. It takes a lot of tweaking to get models to sound like amps. It is easy to get captures to sound right the first time, and then you can just focus on playing. More time playing music, less time tweaking and giving yourself ear fatigue.

I disagree. I find it's very easy to get models sounding like amps - almost no effort required.
 
I disagree. I find it's very easy to get models sounding like amps - almost no effort required.

I find that for someone who knows what they are doing and what they want, both captures and models take about the same amount of time. Not a big difference.

If you are a tweaker or endless searcher, they will also both take forever. Also, if you don't know how to dial in an amp of what amp you are looking for, they can be major time sucks, but I guess faster and cheaper than buying tube amps to learn the ropes like us old people did!
 
Fwiw, one of the benefits of NAM and Tonex captures is that you can check them out in your DAW without any re-amping/routing hassle.
For me, that's a pretty big deal and one of the reasons why I bought a Tonex One (or rather two of them).
 
I disagree. I find it's very easy to get models sounding like amps - almost no effort required.
Same here. And they're much easier for me to dial in for different guitars and pedals than captures, where any attempt to dial in sounds like it's being done at the board. Because it is.
 
Is this really the case for most people? Models sound like amps. They don’t sound like a picture perfect tone without tweaking. Just like amps. I can grab the lowly Boss GX100, load an amp model, and it sounds like an amp through a cab and a microphone. Usually turn a few knobs for 20 seconds and it sounds more than useable in a performance context, a couple more turns and it’s closer to a recording tone. Amps don’t just sound perfect when you stick a mic in front of it because it’s an amp. And NAM captures might sound better, might sound worse, than the “I just loaded an amp model” depending on who made it, what they used, etc etc etc. I think people who are fighting with modelers to sound “more amp like” in 2025 are either using the wrong output method for their desired result, or they’re after some imaginary perfect tone that doesn’t exist in the real world without a keen ear tweaking it either.
I think he means, if you have a reference amp that you want your modeller to replicate then it takes quite a bit of work to match the response. It’ll sound similar but you have to get your hands dirty to get the nuances the same, while a decent capture will get that right straight off the bat.
 
I think he means, if you have a reference amp that you want your modeller to replicate then it takes quite a bit of work to match the response. It’ll sound similar but you have to get your hands dirty to get the nuances the same, while a decent capture will get that right straight off the bat.
If we’re just talking about capturing an amp that you have on-hand to capture yourself at the appropriate settings I suppose that works out easier. I spent a good deal of time with NAM over the last few days helping a friend get a home recording setup going on the cheap and while I do think a lot of the captures sound great, I definitely didn’t find more then one or two out of a dozen or so that sounded like I wanted via the built-in EQ. Horses for courses or whatever.
 
Who is this Nam you speak of? And what he needs support with?

GIF by South Park
 
I think I get great results from both modeling and capturing; they’re not mutually exclusive. Combining top-tier modeling with top-tier capturing in a single high-end hardware unit sounds like a really interesting product to me.

So — as I’ve already said — I’m really looking forward to seeing how the Stadium (with modeling, proxy, and all the GUI and workflow enhancements) will compare to the next generation of Fractal hardware (with modeling, NAM support, and unknown GUI and workflow enhancements).
 
It is easy to get captures to sound right the first time, and then you can just focus on playing. More time playing music, less time tweaking and giving yourself ear fatigue.
Eh, it's easy to get YOUR captures right the first time, because you're capturing your amps. The minute you start relying on others, it's a toss up as to whether it'll work or not.
 
Eh, it's easy to get YOUR captures right the first time, because you're capturing your amps. The minute you start relying on others, it's a toss up as to whether it'll work or not.
This is probably why I don’t care much about NAM. I haven’t owned a tube amp in like 10 years, and I definitely don’t care about capturing the 30 year old Crate combo in my basement that’s too worthless to deal with selling. I also play guitars in pitches on Godzilla can hear so I’m excluded from 97% of captures sounding decent for me anyways, lol.
 
Back
Top