Ed DeGenaro
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,917
I used toEnter, TINA.
I used toEnter, TINA.
But then you took an arrow in the knee?I used to
Took many things, in many parts. Arrow was never one.But then you took an arrow in the knee?
Kemper IMO is nowhere near that point, so I think they deserve a lot more grace than most people are offering. They have a history of under promising and over delivering. I don't think they ever promised to overhaul and expand all their effects, or add wifi editing, or randomly implementing a USB audio driver a decade after launch. So I'm not going to join in and rip the company for missing the summer deadline. I don't think we're going to be waiting for Mk2 profiling five years from now like people are still waiting for plugin compatibility on the QC.
However while they may not be at risk of losing credibility, they are at risk of losing the small amount of market share they current have. Kemper is no longer a sexy product and high definition profiling is not a killer feature (Tonex already has this). I'm rooting for them (and still have a Kemper Player) but I don't see them growing out of the niche market any time soon.
And voting with dollars, I picked up a Fender Tone Master Pro and am really enjoying it. Most people are waiting for the Stadium release which will probably be the biggest modeler launch since QC. Kemper can't really afford to be running their customers off IMO.
they could play the NDSP card and never release the feature at all?The Kemper website still says they expect to release the new profiling this summer. Instead, it's starting to look like the release will coincide with the Stadium release. If that happens, any news of the Kemper release will get buried by the Line6 Steamroller. I'm trying to think of a way they could have done a worse job of managing this release, but I can't think of anything.
they could play the NDSP card and never release the feature at all?

they could play the NDSP card and never release the feature at all?
Agreed. My original post was more of a dig at Neural but I don't agree with future product release announcements at all.I would not be shocked. If they tested it and it falls short of NAM and Tonex v2, and they don't think they can fix that with their architecture limitations, I could definitely see them throwing in the towel.
Agreed. My original post was more of a dig at Neural but I don't agree with future product release announcements at all.
I know why they do it. "Wait don't buy the other product, we have something coming"
However, it just raises expectations. If Stadium Proxy stinks they'll wish they never told anyone it was on their roadmap
But even if MKII profiling isn't as good as tonex V2 and NAM, it can still be a significant upgrade from MKI profiling.I would not be shocked. If they tested it and it falls short of NAM and Tonex v2, and they don't think they can fix that with their architecture limitations, I could definitely see them throwing in the towel.
I don’t think that would work. I have two mk1 profilers, I once tried using the second one to create a profile of a profile running on the first one. The original profile was a great sounding tube amp high gain profile, so plenty of tube tone distortion.Waiting for some to make a Profile of a Mk.2 Kemper Profile using a Mk.1 Kemper and the Mk. 1 Profile sounds identical to the Mk. 2 Profile.
Good ole' ToneJunkie could start selling Mk.1 Profiles of Profiles make from the Mk.2 because God knows he has enough Kempers sitting around.
I tried this with making multiple profiles. First one of the original, then one of the copy, etc etc. Eventually ended up sounding like a Hollywood alien choking on cat hairballsI don’t think that would work. I have two mk1 profilers, I once tried using the second one to create a profile of a profile running on the first one. The original profile was a great sounding tube amp high gain profile, so plenty of tube tone distortion.
The results were awful, the profile of a profile sounded really bad. I tried lots of tweaking the profiling process, but nothing worked.
My reason for trying it was that I had an EQ effect assigned to one of the post stack slots in the original profiler. I had hoped that by profiling that profile with a second Kemper I could “hard bake” the EQ into the new profile, freeing up that effects slot. No such luck.
I tried this with making multiple profiles. First one of the original, then one of the copy, etc etc. Eventually ended up sounding like a Hollywood alien choking on cat hairballs![]()
![]()
Sounds like the "good" old days of cassettes. Friend of a friend bought an album on cassette, then by the time it got to you it was on a copy-of-a-copy-of-a-copy that had significantly degraded in audio quality.