Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 8,355
I don’t dislike a kemper, I dislike a company waiting 10-15 years to sell you the same thing.
I think the jury's still out on that.
I don’t dislike a kemper, I dislike a company waiting 10-15 years to sell you the same thing.
The morph on the kemper is easier but really really limited compared to what you can do on the fractal unitsThe way Kemper does it is not - simply because you don't have to deal with any individual parameters. Which, depending on how many parameters you want to "morph" can become an immense PITA, let alone you have to set their boundaries manually, too. With the Kemper it's as easy as it gets. Setup status A and B, tell the thing to morph between the two, done.
Really, I have been there with the Helix, I tried to create some wild patches and got mad from having to deal with endless parameters.
Kemper has that nailed incredibly well.
I think maybe you’re onto something. When i got my Hughes & Kettner the guy handed me the footswitch with a 10+ meters cable hardwired to it. He also joked that the manual states that you can extend the footswitch wire with a regular computer cable.Good or bad, right or wrong, for better or for worse, C.K / Kemper just do things their own way and that's it. … I've said it before - I think its a lot to do with the "German" ethos.
Is that because it’s a digi box? Because Fender, Gibson, Marshall and the insane amount of boutique stuff claiming to make a better mouse trap have done precisely this for decades.I don’t dislike a kemper, I dislike a company waiting 10-15 years to sell you the same thing.
The morph on the kemper is easier but really really limited compared to what you can do on the fractal units
Yeah, there’s a reason cliff isn’t selling the axefx ultra in 2025, but the 5150iii is still being sold at retail.Is that because it’s a digi box? Because Fender, Gibson, Marshall and the insane amount of boutique stuff claiming to make a better mouse trap have done precisely this for decades.
Is that because it’s a digi box? Because Fender, Gibson, Marshall and the insane amount of boutique stuff claiming to make a better mouse trap have done precisely this for decades.
I really don’t understand the need for the group to repeatedly attack anything that isn’t one of the preferred devices.
To act as if every single piece of new gear hasn't been dissected to ABSOLUTE death is insane. Across every forum, YT comment section or (ewwww) FB group post. It's the nature of the new gear cycle. Add in the geek factor on profiling and good lord, watch out. Time will tell once this thing (with the software update) hits the streets.
This is the first I've heard of this. What is the specific issue?
- Boss reactive loads that don’t work with Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifiers
Honestly, Cliff; I am not sureThis is the first I've heard of this. What is the specific issue?
There's a rabbit hole on that in the links aboveIIRC Suhr have also have stated that they won't honour warranty for amp issues relating to the power amp section of their amps if a Boss TAE has been used. Or did I imagine that?
Yet isn’t that literally what AxeFx2 to 2Mk2 was?Yeah, there’s a reason cliff isn’t selling the axefx ultra in 2025, but the 5150iii is still being sold at retail.
Digital obviously improves and you’d hope the company puts money back into r & d to continually bring out the best they can offer. When someone is just nudging old tech it’s just not that exciting.
Kempers are obviously out there and have their fans, I just think the mk2 is hugely lacklustre. Liquid profiling in theory was more of a needle mover and I don’t even really see people talk about it. I guess you’re either just a kemper person or you’re not, they’re not really going out of their way to win new people over imo.