Dom Mcsweeney
Roadie
- Messages
- 434
so I'm sorry, but I don't follow what you're saying.
I'm talking about snapshots, which is basically the same as morphing
Yes, if you want gradual morphing, the same thing can be done in FAS land, with even more flexibility, but I believe most people turn their morphing time in their Kemper rigs down all the way anyway. In fact it's a common complaint that it's turned up by default. In other words, most people use morphing as a pair of snapshots, just like you find in other modelers, except it's more limited on a Kemper.No, it's not. With morphing, you can gradually change from status A to status B. Impossible with snapshots.
No idea about how things are in FAS land, but on the Helix, gradual morphing of parameters requires a shitton of assignments that you have to do over and over again.
End game feature and tones right here
I dunno, that’s just what I found from the official kemper channel when looking at morphing. There were others equally as badIs there an cab block on the dirty tone here![]()
Yes, but that is hardly different than NAM. I don't see anyone bashing NAM for doing the same thing.
There are 3rd party hardware devices like you mentioned but yeah no "official" NAM player. Idk if there ever will be? The creator seems content helping it reach other platforms vs creating their own hardware device.I don't keep up to date in the capture/profile world, isn't NAM the software that different companies have been putting in their products, or plan to? Now I'm confused....did they release a hardware unit?
I don't keep up to date in the capture/profile world, isn't NAM the software that different companies have been putting in their products, or plan to? Now I'm confused....did they release a hardware unit?
I think the point Mr EEEEEEEE is trying to make is that training for NAM is done via a computer, so why is everyone hating on Kemper for going that direction.I don't keep up to date in the capture/profile world, isn't NAM the software that different companies have been putting in their products, or plan to? Now I'm confused....did they release a hardware unit?
My wild speculative guess (with no insider knowledge) is that since the DSP chip is the same as MK1
Is there anything actually different about the physical units, aside from the new aluminum parts?
I see there's a few pages below this post, but from the spot I'm at right now this looks like, literally, a new $1500 Kemper skin that comes with a FW update.
I have to be missing something.
No one has yet released a NAM hardware unit that trains a model in the hardware itself.
It would be cool, but if it was possible I imagine it would be much much slower that way (training on device), but I can imagine some clever ways could be implemented. Perhaps by way of wifi or whatever, and a connection to Tone3000 APIWhen that happens, if done right, will be the device to beat.
I think the point Mr EEEEEEEE is trying to make is that training for NAM is done via a computer, so why is everyone hating on Kemper for going that direction.
The ARM cpu is new. That's why the Mk2 adds more USB channels. The DSP processor is the same as it ever was and forever will be on the Kemper. There was discussion a few pages back about whether this means the Mk1 is technically capable of running the new profiling. It might be. It's hard to say. But there's no way Kemper will permit it.
You don't seem to get that morphing involves an expression pedal. It is not typically a timed ramp or an instantaneous switch.Yes, if you want gradual morphing, the same thing can be done in FAS land, with even more flexibility, but I believe most people turn their morphing time in their Kemper rigs down all the way anyway. In fact it's a common complaint that it's turned up by default. In other words, most people use morphing as a pair of snapshots, just like you find in other modelers, except it's more limited on a Kemper.
I'm just saying I wouldn't go so far as to say morphing is unique to Kemper, but that's just my humble opinion.
Edit: Also, you're interested in gradual morphing, the control you have over the response curvature on the AxeFX is a big plus. It's hard to beat the AxeFX for this kind of thing.