KingsXJJ
Shredder
- Messages
- 2,105
That’s stanky.
That’s stanky.
It wasThat’s stanky.
Hilarious and witty of him, but that's not been true for at least five years. If you can't get a banging tone with just an amp block and a dynacab, you're a fucking mental midget.
Where do I turn off the digital mids?Hilarious and witty of him, but that's not been true for at least five years. If you can't get a banging tone with just an amp block and a dynacab, you're a fucking mental midget.
Ah, the lore of diminishing reburns. ATOADASO.
Hilarious and witty of him, but that's not been true for at least five years. If you can't get a banging tone with just an amp block and a dynacab, you're a fucking mental midget.
Where do I turn off the digital mids?
In all honestly, NDSP has Digital John
I put my application in for Digital Mid
I often recommend putting a TS out front to enhance themThe first time I saw "Digital Mids" I said it in my head in the "Digital John" voice!
From what I can gather from breakdown's of the Player (that is already MK2 ready) the DSP and SRAM (the parts used to actually create sound) implies that ALL MK2 versions of the profiler use the exact same sound creating chips.So it is unclear to me - they are saying it is "more powerful" but have they actually (a) upgraded the core DSP Chips / Power (?) or (b) is the "more power" from better written and more advanced FW and Profiling Processes running on the same MK1 hardware (?)
These waters are very murky !!
I think (don't know for sure) that the data for a profile is likely stored in the frequency domain. If that is the case, then essentially the MK2 would have a much higher (don't know how much higher since Kemper hasn't published how many samples their MK1 takes) "clean frequency" point. The Mk1 would have the same quality as it does today with an MK2 profile (my guess).Granted we're dealing with Schrödinger's Kemper here, but the only thing they could do with the lower resolution profiles would be to interpolate the missing data. Would that be an improvement, or is it just what the existing units already do?
I 100% agree with all your criteria for a digital amp. I just have different results. Still, it's about gigging and having a great time doing it. The gear is just a way of getting there. If FM3 gets you there, that's great.I was told that and it didn’t really help. And I can’t see
That’s exactly why i sold my kemper to buy an fm3
I gotta be really honest. I bought the kemper to replace my tubes amps as I was getting hired by a band that required silent stage, stereo effects etc.
I struggled like never to get a cardboarded non dynamic kind of plexi crunch. I just coud not play the kemper it was nothing like an amp.
First rehearsal, the other guitarist in the band had a ax8….
It was like I was playing on a peavey bandit and he had a full Bradshaw rig…
And don’t talk about the dynamic, if kemper can’t replicate the dynamic of a plexi then it just can’t replicate dynamic, just faking it.
Agree.So, you think that gazillions of guitarists (some high profile ones among them) are just ignoring that cocked wah sound? Sorry, but I call BS.
IME (which admittedly is only a few days with the Fractal Axe III Fx), you are correct. You can get any tone you want on either unit, but you get there more easily with Kemper.Spent a good chunk of today trying to dial in the Fractal to get the midrange presence of the Kemper with a Michael Britt profile. What ended up getting me very close was using one of his IRs and then it was almost there. Similarly replacing the cab in a Michael Britt profile with the Leon Todd TV Mix got me really close to Fractal with the same IR.
Not saying it’s just the cab but that’s probably most of it.
You can get any tone you want on either unit, but you get there more easily with Kemper.
Me and a few other engineers are speculating
ooooo... we've all been waiting for you to come back. Come on then. Let's be having you.
By that and your earlier comments, I think you're saying you drive a locomotive. That probably doesn't qualify you to speak authoritatively on digital signal processing.Me and a few other engineers
Not if you don't have the right profile, in which case you're relegated to sifting through free shit, or pulling out your wallet.IME (which admittedly is only a few days with the Fractal Axe III Fx), you are correct. You can get any tone you want on either unit, but you get there more easily with Kemper.
By that and your earlier comments, I think you're saying you drive a locomotive. That probably doesn't qualify you to speak authoritatively on digital signal processing.
![]()
Senior Sales Engineer At Sweetwater
I wouldn’t say no to that description of a lead tone though…until your solo sounds like a metal scrapyard being sucked into a black hole.
I wouldn’t say no to that description of a lead tone though…
In other words, this just could be a money grab?In other words, I don't understand why they can't just offer the updated profiling to everyone but reduce the number of them that can be held on an MK1.