For me, this is the state of things for any profile or capture.
Or amp model...
I've never used a Kemper, but I'm always very happy with how NAM models turn out, and Tonex fwiw.
It's ridiculous because it usually does sound THE SAME.
Also, a nice touch is that after training a NAM model there are details of the ESR.
Sometimes it's 0.001 or something, perhaps a little better, or a little worse.
So, not only do I get pleasingly great tones in my ears, but also there is a confirmation, in writing, as part of the training process which lets me know I'm not just going crazy with thinking it sounds THE SAME - because it is basically THE SAME.
(If you aren't sure what it means, ESR is basically Error Signal Ratio, in other words "a null test").
I do like the idea of the Kemper Player - it looks cool, great functionality, and I'm sure people who have one will be happy with all these updates. . . but I can't wait to see the results of a comparison when it's finally out there because the marketing copy is wildly BOLD.
I know Mendel, Leo, and several others will likely do some tests, and this will reveal what we all need to know.