I am equally convinced that some of my favorite profiles (Morgan AC 20, Mesa Mark IIc, etc) will still be my favorite profiles regardless of any new tech introduced.
Which Mesa Mark IIc profile is that?
I am equally convinced that some of my favorite profiles (Morgan AC 20, Mesa Mark IIc, etc) will still be my favorite profiles regardless of any new tech introduced.
Sadly, I expect that MK1 users (like me) will not be seeing any more free updates moving forward.
Sorry, no idea on that one but it's nice to see that they are being pro-active and fixing things.Have you heard if the improved NAM functionality is legit for Anagram?
I don’t care about your nulled or scientific way of measuring latency or whatever.
All viable solutions, but would require additional AD/DA conversion to sit between the pre and post effects of say a Helix or Fractal.I dunno man... the NAM Player by Dimehead is incredible so far in my opinion, combine it with any HX Stomp or FAS VP4 or whatever, and it's even awesomer. I get it's not got everything like more mature multi-fx units on the market, but it's not really aiming to be that either.
Also, Anagram looks awesome too. Does alot more, but it's not in stock currently so I've not tried it yet.
That’s fair, if you claim absolute then it’s going to be tested.I've never been to a gig and thought anything bad about someone who achieved great tones with a rig I wouldn't choose myself, more power to them. It's nothing to do with this conversation though, really.
The point here is, if someone says ''WE HAVE THE MOST BESTEST NEW TECHNOLOGY'', someone unbiased should review that.
I look forward to know the results of a test by whomever does that.
The point here is, if someone says ''WE HAVE THE MOST BESTEST NEW TECHNOLOGY'', someone unbiased should review that.
The point here is, if someone says ''WE HAVE THE MOST BESTEST NEW TECHNOLOGY'', someone unbiased should review that.
I look forward to know the results of a test by whomever does that.
And I asked AI to recreate the ML.And see that's the thing - show this pic to 1000 rando's in the street and ask them if they like or dislike the Mona Lisa, almost all wont know that this isn't it the actual ML.
I think they sound good but similar has been on ToneNET for awhile with my JEL100.
The JEL has a bit more character in the gain structure but similar.
Like Mike, I tried to capture a Mesa quad 290 combo. I couldn’t get it done. It sounded absolutely nothing like the preamp and amp into a cab. And when I say nothing like it, I mean, nothing like it!The Michael Nielsen video shows problems with the Kemper too. And its not like Michael doesn’t know what he’s doing.
"It doesn't matter."
"The audience will never know."
“No one can tell in a mix anyway.”
“If it sounds good, it is good.”
“Nobody cares but guitar players.”
“It’s 95% there—good enough.”
“You’re just being too picky.”
“You’re supposed to tweak it after profiling.”
“It’s not meant to be exact, just close.”
“That amp had bad tubes or a weird mic position anyway.”
“Try profiling it again—maybe something went wrong.”
“It’s close enough for live shows.”
“Why lug around 80 lbs of gear for a 5% difference?”
“I sold all my amps and don’t miss them.”
“You can’t beat the convenience.”
“Tone is in the fingers.”
“Music is about emotion, not fidelity.”
“Chasing tone is a waste of time.”
“You're just romanticizing analog gear.”
“I A/B’d them and couldn’t tell the difference.”
“You’re imagining the difference.”
“Placebo effect—Kemper wins blind tests.”
“You must not know how to dial it in.”
Apologia for dogshit.
Yes it is. Kemper sounds like a used tampon.
I can hear a difference. Nearly 100% of the time. The fact you and others can't doesn't reflect poorly on me. Rather the opposite.