Chocol8
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,755
Wedding bands especially. People want their favourite songs to sound like they do on the record.
Hire a DJ. It’s cheaper and they sound just like the record.
Wedding bands especially. People want their favourite songs to sound like they do on the record.
Hire a DJ. It’s cheaper and they sound just like the record.
This definitely isn't for me but some of my mates will love tech like this.
Hire a DJ. It’s cheaper and they sound just like the record.
$14k, bro
My friend who does it makes about $3k for a wedding.For a wedding DJ? I thought DJs only made that kind of money at proms and golf courses! Seriously, I have a friend who is a DJ and he is DEFINITELY not making anywhere close to that. He makes enough to supplement his full time job, and his competitors he is friendly with are working full time jobs as well.
I didn't even notice thatSo I'm supposed to let the guy who chose this sweater choose my guitar tones?
View attachment 52333
I don't think so.
He could have had, like, 10 scarves, easy.I didn't even notice that![]()
It's super easy to get pulled into the cover band $ trap. Ask me how I know! I like it as it affords me the ability to buy as much gear as I could want for the most part and it lets me play music with friends. There are loftier ambitions you could have as an original musician for sure and I have tried going those routes at various points in my life. I never got to a place where that made any sort of dent in the outside world and I was fine with that, too.
The biggest negative trap a cover band has ime is the other side of that "making $" coin. Yes you can buy gear or do all sorts of meaningful stuff with that supplemental money but it also means that everyone in your circle expects anything you do to have an associated financial windfall and that isn't the case all the time.
Bias just dropped basically the same thing in software form. My expectations are low but I’ll give it a whirl.
I get it but isn't it sort of taking all the fun out of guitar playing? It's like buying a new car and there's no wheel since it's a self driving one.. I mean sure if you hate driving (tone sculpting in this case).
My friend who does it makes about $3k for a wedding.
Despite Groundhog Audio's pitch, I just can't imagine a lot of (any) players dropping this thing on a stage and trying to get through a cover band gig straight out of the box. I see it more as a tool people will use at home, to learn a wide variety of material quickly. And for that application, it could be fun and practical.Honestly I feel the same way. I think it could be really useful for people who never want to touch gear and just get through a gig. But if you were a cover band jumping from stem tone matches song to song it's going to sound like ass live. And you're never going to develop your own sound.
I think they did it on their speaker or phone app first yeah.It's interesting that the pedal mfr is called "Groundhog Audio", because I could swear I messed around with a similar software package around a year or two ago. Might even have been from Positive Grid. I think that iteration was just looking at a database of song presets pre-curated by actual humans, though.
(Now that I think about it, I remember thinking it was surprisingly decent-sounding, for a phone app.)