I dunno. I feel like Eagle provided the clarification here. There’s a difference between simply releasing a new product (like Helix after HD500x or HX FX after M9) and releasing a direct successor that causes an older product to cease production.
Pointing to the coexistence of HD500 and Pocket POD and Helix as a counterpoint to this claim isn’t really relevant—they’re vastly different and don’t compete in the same space.
The pain point, as I read Eagle’s account, is when a successor causes an older product to cease production, making it harder to get unique parts for the now-replaced product.
I’m reading two different arguments between the two of you, not two sides of one argument.