Boss GT-1000 (and possibly other things Boss...)

Ok, perhaps this would deserve a dedicated thread because I think it's really, really cool (may create one when my setup is more or less complete).

So, I'm making progress with TouchOSC. Found a script that'd send all fader values at once, which is pretty much a key function to synchronize TouchOSC and the controlled device in case there's no feedback between the app and the controlled device (which there isn't - and I doubt you could even make it work with either the GT or the Stomp). That's why I'm sending out all values from the app and then have a WYSIWYG scenario. Once I had this sorted (at first I wasn't sure it'd be working...), I knew I could go all in.
Boss offers a pretty comprehensive Sysex spec for the GT-1000, so technically you could probably use that to read values if TouchOSC supports it. But it gets highly technical, and hard to understand real quick.

Please post screenshots of your TouchOSC setup!
 
Boss offers a pretty comprehensive Sysex spec for the GT-1000, so technically you could probably use that to read values if TouchOSC supports it. But it gets highly technical, and hard to understand real quick.

Yeah, I'm sort of aware of that and I will perhaps try to find things out. What I certainly won't do is to manually set up SysEx faders. The MIDI implementation chart is just the usual horror. I would be able to figure it out I guess, but: In case bidirectional communication could be made to work, each and every parameter covered by SysEx should throw out the respective SysEx stream anyway. So I could just record that (I think TO supports that) and send it as well. Should even be sort of easy as this is mainly what TouchOSC is all about (unless you're using the OSC format).
And fwiw, I did a pretty similar thing *way* back in the days, I kind of built a controller for my Boss Sound Canvas in Logic's environment, and it's been less of a pain than what I intially thought it'd be (had to do some trickery to actually record the Boss fader SysEx output to Logics SysEx faders, don't remember anymore). Send SysEx, record it and use the same event type to control things. Great, at least on paper.
Still, so far I don't think it's exactly worth the effort. But then, yes, I would free all the assigment slots up, which might become a neat thing one day.
Anyway, so far I will stick with what I have and get it running.

Please post screenshots of your TouchOSC setup!

I will, once I have sufficiently sorted the page thing and be done with my first complete setup. Maybe later today. Could post the TO patch as well.
 
That went faster than I thought yet again (TouchOSC is really neat to deal with), GT page and preliminary smartphone layout ready. Will likely change colors and what not, but as long as I can easily operate things (*check*) I don't mind the unfancy look (and it's actually looking quite better on the phone itself for whatever reasons).

TouchOSC.jpeg


As far as the controlled parameters go:

- Gain, volume, BMT for the Boss amp (used for cleans).

- CPLVL is controlling a pre-dirt compressor's output. I'm using this to push all leads (regardless whether they're clean or dirty), LDLVL is controlling the post-amp EQ output with a tad of low (and sometimes high) cut, plus a little mid bump. This very way of creating lead sounds out of any rhythm sound is working for me since decades. I'm using very moderate compressor settings, all I want is a bit more "flesh" (aka decay) and a light volume bump.

- DFBCK and DLVL should be obvious. So far they're controlling the Boss' Master Delay's parameters, but I may end up using one of the simple delays as a main (hence global) delay, saving the fancier Master Delay types for, well, fancier things.

- RDEC and RVOL should be obvious as well. Btw., this is one of my biggest annoyances with the GT. I really wish I had two reverbs. One could be a pretty simple one, if it was after me (I like a mix of delay and reverb on driven lead tones, the reverb serving as a kind of "masking" thing, so the delay repeats don't get too obvious).

4th page so far only has my "Send All Fader Values" button, but I will add some program change buttons as I can't change banks on the GT anymore (I rather use all switches for patch modifications).
 
The Stomp pages will take longer to do as I will have to program a nice working main patch first. Still undecided on my main dirt pedal platform amp (the new Xtra Blue is a very hot candidate, though, but it's using up plenty of juice) and I can only make a decision for the dirt pedals and what not inside the Stomp when I decided which analog pedals will stay on the startup version of the entire board shebang.
 
GRRR! All of a sudden things don't seem to be too great anymore. There seems to be no easy way to save the status of your faders when you last used them in TouchOSC. Apparently you can set a default value (which is fine), but in case I changed many parameters on a gig, I won't be able to copy all the used values into the default boxes. Just re-saving the patch will not save the fader settings. ChatGPT kept telling me I could save the fader settings with the layout, but it's clearly hallucinating (also making up functions that don't exist).
Waiting for the FB experts to possibly answer...
 
Ok, here's the second page, namely the one to control the Stomp:

TouchOSC_Stomp.jpeg


As said, I need to do this for any Stomp patch that I will load (we all know how it's losing all MIDI assignments once you change any models), for now it's the Xtra Blue and 3 pedals. And that's exactly what I will use for a start. The drive pedals are assigned to switches 1-3, DRV and VOL of each represented by the faders shown. Not sure, I might slap them onto the second page and add their tone controls, but I may as well not. With drives, I used to keep their tone controls pretty much the same, it's much more about the tone stack of the amp that might need adjustment live. I possibly wouldn't even need the dirt pedals gain parameter, but as the space was there...


AAAAALLLLLLRIIIIGHT....
Guess I'm now done for the time being (of course I'm not as there's sooo many things to explore with this setup). My first testruns were really, really promising.

In the end, the procedure when setting up things will be:
Load proper GT bank, load proper Stomp patch (obviously, both will usually be loaded when switching the board on). Start TouchOSC, load patch saved to work with the Stomp's patch (as in with parameters pre-adjusted properly), send all values of the patch.

After that, it's pretty much like working with a kinda "traditional" loopswitcher setup. Amps, dirt boxes and some extra stuff can be adjusted WYSIWYG style, will be working globally while all combinations can be called up through patches, with plenty of "non-global" devices left to fool around with. All patch switching will be instantly, very likely including reverb/delay trail spillover (unless I decide to use a radically different signal path, which is quite unlikely)

I should possibly add that the MS-50G, while not the greatest unit on earth anymore, fits pretty much perfectly into that setup (apart from it not being remote controlled, which I could possibly change with some CME MIDI-to-USB tool, but I don't think I'll be going there), as it's another device allowing for global adjustements of the few patches I will cycle through. I typically set up 2-3 patches per gig and add them whenever I feel like. There's a pretty weird kaputt-fuzz that I like, the phaser is quite great, the touch wah too, etc. And, just as the doctor ordered: it has an auto-save function. So when you dial something in, there's no need to save things. Yeah, risky as well, but I'm by now used to it.

In a nutshell: While cobbling all of it together has really been a partially nervewrecking experience (in fact: no, not really), so far I think that every single minute has been worth it and will pay of a thousand times in the future. At least given the functionality, this is pretty much precisely the setup I always wanted. Especially as I can easily move between "almost like analog", fully programmable and anything inbetween.
 
Just returned from a rehearsal room session. Used the full setup for the first time, including a carefully prepared TouchOSC patch and what not.
Can't remember the last time I had so much fun with a new rig. Absolutely everything worked every single bit as I was hoping it would.

I'm still astonished about the clean sound of the GT that I was using (the Natural amp), because it's quite lackluster on its own but working so well in context. Compared it with the new HX Super Reverb for some minutes (all in context with drums, bass and keyboards) and while the Super Reverb does sound and feel somewhat better, those differences are getting almost entirely lost once the musical context is getting a little busier - so there's absolutely no need to think about a way to replace the clean portion of the GT.
Used the new HX Xtra Blue amp as an almost clean pedal platform and some analog pedals and the internal HX drives for various degrees of dirt. Sounded incredibly nice IMO.
In this very scenario, the GT works fantastically well. FX are good to great, gapless switching is gorgeous and finally having global blocks is just *such* a relief.
And well, being able to control all crucial (and then some...) parameters via TouchOSC is friggin' gorgeous.
For this session I used one of the vanilla delays for all "normal" delay duties and reserved the Master Delay for the fun stuff. Had Feedback, Mix and Wow of the Space Echo and Feedback and Mix of an additional Echo routed to some faders on a dedicated TouchOSC page, plus Resonance of a post-delay Flanger that I had on a dedicated switch. Quite a blast.
 
Last edited:
I had both the core and the full. I kept the full for small quick shows. It’s awful in so many ways. Pitch shifter is total barf. Editing is garbage. Preset switching is fast and smooth!
 
Small side observation: Super stupid implementation of global EQs. I mean, no, not really, it's actually quite nice that you can have different global EQs for the Main and Sub outs, frequencies and ranges are well chosen, too, so there's that. But the damn EQs aren't switchable. Along with that (and even worse) comes that there's no index whether you used them or not. So you might as well have applied a noticeable low cut and compensate for it on your next patch creation session without looking at the global EQ.
Should be switchable and there should be a little status icon on the screen (there's more than enough space).
Fwiw, the same is true for the HX Stomp. Even if the global EQ is switchable, there's no indication of its status (there'd possibly be sufficient screen estate, too), just the bigger models have it.

Companies really need UI consultants. All of them.
 
Small side observation: Super stupid implementation of global EQs. I mean, no, not really, it's actually quite nice that you can have different global EQs for the Main and Sub outs, frequencies and ranges are well chosen, too, so there's that. But the damn EQs aren't switchable. Along with that (and even worse) comes that there's no index whether you used them or not. So you might as well have applied a noticeable low cut and compensate for it on your next patch creation session without looking at the global EQ.
Should be switchable and there should be a little status icon on the screen (there's more than enough space).
Fwiw, the same is true for the HX Stomp. Even if the global EQ is switchable, there's no indication of its status (there'd possibly be sufficient screen estate, too), just the bigger models have it.

Companies really need UI consultants. All of them.
Same deal on the Ampero 2 and Fractal. To be fair those are already pretty packed for what's on screen in any view, the A2 especially can't fit pretty much anything in its top bar without a redesign.

I guess companies consider global EQ more like a "set and forget" thing rather than something you'd toggle or change often, or any changes you'd do on it are subtle enough that they won't make or break anything.
 
I guess companies consider global EQ more like a "set and forget" thing rather than something you'd toggle or change often, or any changes you'd do on it are subtle enough that they won't make or break anything.

Yeah, I guess so. But that's stupid, really. I mean, if I ever grab a global EQ, it's for either the FOH out or my monitoring out, pretty much never for both (and usually just for my monitor out). And I'm usually using things similarily at home, as in using the FOH out as a recording feed while monitoring through the other out. Even arranged it like that on my old board incarnation. Now let me forget my global EQ and *blam* - the signal I'm monitoring isn't the same signal I'm recording. Pfft.
And fwiw, I'm absolutely sure that these things happen somewhere in the wild. There's plenty of folks not even remotely being aware of how things work and interact. Can't remember how often I've been reading some tips about how you could "fix", say, the lack of proper/steeper lo/hi cuts in the HX Floor's cab block by using the global EQ. Yeah, right.

So people may as well stumble over the global EQ in the GT/Stomp accidentally.
"Oh, there's another EQ, great, let me see what it does!"
"Wow, now that I've raised the low mids, everything sounds nice and juicy!"
2 days later:
"Boohoohoo, I bypassed each and every block and my guitar still doesn't sound the same as if I'd be running it into the amp straight, this unit is such a sound sucker, goddamn congested Boss mids!"
 
Almost forgot, first full gig with the new board arrangement last friday. Corporate event, anything from somewhat groovy to slightly rock-ish. So, defenitely not the most difficult stuff to cover for a modeling based setup, but as it's been pretty much a telephone band (hence no preparation, no rehearsed songs), things required some adjustments. Which went as smooth as it could possibly get.
Everything was pretty fine at soundcheck but I finetuned some smaller things during the gig which I'm sure nobody noticed as I had the tablet on a music stand anyway, located somewhat to my right, so holding a note/chord and quickly grabbing a fader was quite an unobtrusive thing to do.

I should possibly add that I limited the parameter range for all faders on the controlled parameters so "everything sort of at noon" would give me my preprogrammed settings and allowed me to deviate by some percents (as an example, the entire fader for my clean amp's treble covers a range from 30 to 70 (instead of 0 to 100). Defenitely a great idea for live because virtual faders on a tablet always are a tad fiddly to use, so you better limit them to a range around the preprogrammed sweet spot.

Anyhow, everything went absolutely smooth, sound was great, too. On the last, slightly louder and somewhat rock-ish-er 2 sets I almost completely stayed within the Stomp realm, used the new Xtra Blue as an ever so slightly hairy pedal platform, felt incredibly well and apparently sounded just great for anyone else, too, at least the FOH guy seemed so happy he even told me how easy it was for him (just a fader up thing).

So, by now I have global blocks, instant, gapless switching and delay/verb spillover covered. Exactly what I always wanted. Things could certainly be worse.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, long-time user of Boss GT series (all the GT's since GT6).

Some thoughts:
  • The GT1000 is a good, solid unit with great effects. Works well in 4cm with the JVM410 (midi controlled).
  • The amps are acceptable but largely underwhelming. X Crunch is the standout.
  • The unit sounds much better through a tube power amp (especially stereo) than through "FRFR".
  • With the GT1000, I always thought there was a characteristic (and unpleasant 'sound'), which I struggle to define and may even be imagining. I have noticed that pulling back the 500k band by 3 - 5 dB straight after the amp helps reduce this problem.
  • My current GT1000 configuration is an Amplifire AA3 in the loop and midi controlled (using its amps - mainly Friedman HB/HBE), with the GT1000 providing affects (and the Twin amp). This is then run into a Carvin TS100 and 4x12 stereo cab.
  • This setup has the following advantages: (i) Uses the AA3's excellent amps; (ii) Uses the GT1000's very good effects; & (iii) avoids the nightmarish UI of the AA3 (I only need to access the 'standard' amp knobs on the AA3).
  • Comparison-wise, I think my powered Kemper Rack into Kones, guitar cabs, & "FRFR" still sounds better
Cheers
Paul
 
Fwiw, forgot to mention that I played 2 "full" gigs with just the GT by now (train traveling forced me to leave the bigger board at home). Actually felt quite a bit better than I expected. I already metioned it regarding the clean amp, pretty much the same is true for the driven amp I was using (X-Crunch all the way). Pretty lackluster in my home studio but working fine in a band context. The Natural OD (only drive I'm using) is just working fine, too. No need to talk about the other FX, it's Boss and they just know how to do them, at least as long as bread'n'butter is concerned. The only thing I really wish was more flexible is the wahs. I'm not a fan of extremely resonant wahs or anything, but the GT ones are really tame. Still pretty decent for cleans, but as soon as things become overdriven, I wish there was a little "more" to be had.

I also created a TouchOSC template to create a global block controlling thing, worked a treat, using the internal BT option. Really, what a nice thing being able to just correct some patches pretty much at any time because there's no more floor crawling and re-saving involved.

Apart from all that, the unit feels very, very solid and sturdy, just in the best Boss tradition.

Now that the initial patch creation horror is done, I have a feeling that this will stay for a long time. The bigger board is pretty much a dream coming true for me and by now I also know that I can grab just the GT and still have fun.
 
Could you also do an entire gig with the HX Stomp?

Not only could I, but I already did play some gigs with just the Stomp. Admittedly, I usually had my Hotone Soulpress II (Wah/Vol) with me, though. And it's getting yet better when slapping it on my little board, featuring whatever dirt pedal, an RC Boost clone, a DI box for splitting duties and a little EQ to control my monitor.
Anyhow, while possible, it's a lot more comfortable to use the GT instead. Sure, the Stomp is sounding better, but in this case, comfort and easy tweakability win.
 
The customer that I do all the programming for has now done several gigs with the GT-1000 Core, two identical ones actually. Only difference is one is set to DI, one is set to power amp+regular cab, depending on the gig.

It actually sounds pretty damn good (I've seen quite a few of the performance videos). The editor sucks balls though, unless I'm missing something major. Moving patches around is tedious AF. I'd still prefer a HX Stomp, but perhaps it's just because I'm still more comfortable with it.
 
The editor sucks balls though, unless I'm missing something major.

Of course you're not missing anything. Any editing, regardless whether it's on the device, through the Mac/PC editor or through the mobile editors (which are an offense towards human intelligence, no less) is as bad as it possibly gets.
Yeah, most operations within a single patch are ok-ish using the desktop editor, but as you say, moving patches and such is plain horrorshow.
And it's not only that, sometimes the editor doesn't properly update all parameters (especially true for assignments, and I'm using all possible 16 slots in pretty much all patches). So you're sitting there, staring at the assigments, thinking "didn't I just assign CC 87 to the mid control of that amp?" And obviously, I did (checking in the hardware proves that), just that it's not reflected (or updated in a remotely timely manner) in the editor. Sometimes I even need to restart the editor to see the actual state. And all that at crawling speed, just because the stupid idiots decided to use "vanilla" MIDI for device communication (as in it not being faster through USB than it would be using a DIN MIDI cable) - in 2018 or so. WTF?

Along these lines, should anyone be interested in a GT, my most important advices would be:

- Check what the unit can do, especially in terms of controls. It's a whole friggin' lot, but utilizing all of it IMO wouldn't be too clever because it's too easy to lose track.

- Clearly define the things you need to operate the unit. Layout of switches and their functions, assignments of whatever it might be, etc.

- In case you're using the global block (aka "Stompbox") functionality, make absolutely sure to remember which slots you're using (there's 10 per each block and IMO it's clever to use no more than 2-3 per block, reserving the rest for block preset copying - or rather not use them at all, because this is where it really gets confusing).

- When done with these decisions, create just 2-3 basic patches that you will from now on use as a reference for any further patches. Creating new patches from an "empty" default preset is defenitely the most time consuming thing you can run into, simply because editing is so horrible.

- Try to get along with just a handful of patches for a start. Because it's very likely that you will find some things you could optimize. And you will very likely want to have these optimized things to be reflected in all patches, so it's clever to not have too many of them until that point. You possibly even want to rinse and repeat. This is where I'm currently at. I am right now revising my "main patch structure" for the 2nd time. I'll change some switch assigments again, use a slightly different routing and use a different delay as my global delay. I will do this on my 2 "master" patches and then recreate all other individual patches again by "save as". Still a lot faster than changing these things on those individual patches.

Once done with all that, the unit is sort of easy to operate. In my case, I basically just alter FX blocks 3 and 4, the Master Delay and on 1-2 patches the Master Reverb. Pretty much anything else will stay identical all throughout.

Fwiw, having said all that, it's a shame how all this went. I still own my GT-10 and onboard editing is such a breeze, really. The plain and simple reason being that there's a dedicated switch for each block. Click once to select (bringing up the 4 most relevant parameters above the encoders), any further clicks will toggle between on/off. Excellent.
I still remember how I was interested in the GT-100 for my musical theatre jobs that I had plenty of back then and could even get a spnsored production unit for one season (could've bought it for cheap after that season). After just two rehearsals I gave it back and went on with the good old GT-10. The 100 was just too much of a shock in terms of usability.
And to anyone saying that having individual block switches would be impossible with the raised amount of blocks: No, it wouldn't. It's still less than 30 blocks overall (plus some utility blocks, such as the dividers, but you really don't need quick access to them). So just give me a little 4x8 switching panel with small knobs, ideally color coded ones, possibly sorted by function. Would perhaps cost 20 extra bucks to make, but it'd be worth 10 times that for any user.
 
Back
Top