Anybody wanna learn Autumn Leaves/jazz standard?

I can hang but whipping out Parkeresque type solos, man that stuff gets really heady. I guess you just have to do a lot of it for a long time. Legend has it he practiced somewhere around 8-10 hours a day growing up.
So did Van Halen, Malmsteen, and Prince. That may be what it takes to get to that level.

While not everyone is able to put in that many hours of practicing, having a regular schedule with a significant time commitment (three or more hours a day) does pay off.

When I was playing my best I was playing a lot every day; gigging weekly, rehearsals two or three times a week, practicing daily, and sitting in with other musicians as much as possible. We had a running jam session going on in our house and when no one came over my drummer and I used to roam around North and West Philadelphia looking for other guys who were playing who'd let us sit in. Music was our life and I've never played better.

I'm committed to increasing my time practicing more in the days ahead. As I told my sons many times, you have to work for reward, in this case playing on the level that you aspire to attain.

"George Benson: ‘I practice every single day"
 
Last edited:
"George Benson: ‘I practice every single day"
Richie Kotzen “Sometimes I can go a month without touching my guitar”. He told me this personally. I could have killed him 😂 How can you be so good and not be playing morning, noon and night?
 
Last edited:
Naaah I believed him. He was in the middle of some pretty big DIY home repairs/upgrades at the time.

Edit: interview is here, some pretty good info about his career and perspective. Unfortunately the practice thing got cut, maybe because we were discussing his house for a bit. Anyway, for anyone interested: https://musicplayers.com/2017/06/richie-kotzen-call-just-shredder-injustice/
Nice Interview.

Well I dunno man I lived up the street in the mountain above Malibu from him and there isn’t much reason to get off this mountain.

As in most guys up there that are musicians just chill and play :-)
 
Last edited:
I totally get that, and for the most part I feel the same way. The thing that interests me about bebop is I pretty much suck at it 😂. The melodies and the changes, fine. I can hang but whipping out Parkeresque type solos, man that stuff gets really heady. I guess you just have to do a lot of it for a long time. Legend has it he practiced somewhere around 8-10 hours a day growing up.

Yeah, I can’t do it either. I guess it’s something I never had any desire to learn to play though.

As a drummer I used to enjoy playing bebop a bit. The openness and freedom of it was fun, kind of the same feeling as just jamming with friends.

But even though it was fun to play it was never something I enjoyed listening to.

And for whatever reason as a guitarist and bassist I just never had any interest in playing it.
 
Been following this thread with interest (taught myself a couple new chord shapes thanks to Ed), and noticed a couple of those shapes can be called by different names (no surprise.)


I was wondering if anyone would mind explaining why you'd use one vs. the other. I'd expect it has something to do with context...

Examples:
GMaj9 & Bm7
F#m7b5 & Am6
 
Been following this thread with interest (taught myself a couple new chord shapes thanks to Ed), and noticed a couple of those shapes can be called by different names (no surprise.)


I was wondering if anyone would mind explaining why you'd use one vs. the other. I'd expect it has something to do with context...

Examples:
GMaj9 & Bm7
F#m7b5 & Am6
Maybe wrap your mind around this first: A F#m7b7 chord has exactly the same notes as an Am6…very factual. What you call it…depends on what the bass does…with any luck the bass follows the composition ;)

The bass note determines the “function” of a chord…and by that the amount of tension..the degree it needs resolution.

Let’s assume chord changes Ami6 F#m7b5 Bm7b5 E7. A will feel like a root, like home. Changing the bass to F# doesn’t change anything in the upper harmony…but the F#m7b5 will not feel like home at all. The bass is very determining in how a harmony feels.
 
Short tip: Being able to play the melodies of whatever tunes is an important thing in general, but learning the melody of this particular tune is even more beneficial as all the target notes are the thirds of the underlying chords, hence they're already leading you through the song a great deal.

Jimmy Garrison, John Coltrane's bass player, told me that when improvising a solo, "Know where you are, know where you've been, know where you're going".

Keeping track of where you are in the song is definitely an important part of planning what to play next.
Yeah learning the melody really well has helped me a lot when improvising. That and having the changes down and knowing where all the notes are on the fretboard cold.

P.S. Oh and almost forgot, 3rds and 7ths
 
Been following this thread with interest (taught myself a couple new chord shapes thanks to Ed), and noticed a couple of those shapes can be called by different names (no surprise.)


I was wondering if anyone would mind explaining why you'd use one vs. the other. I'd expect it has something to do with context...

Examples:
GMaj9 & Bm7
F#m7b5 & Am6
When I do these theater books I stumble on all sorts of these gems. This last one I learned is if you want a 9 chord, just play the straight minor 5 half steps down. I had a measure with a quarter note rest, Emin7 for 2 beats then A9 for the last beat. Simply turning the min7 to the straight minor gave me what I needed for A9! In A……E (5th) G (dom7) and B (9). Really made it way easier. I think guys who are great at this can compute this kind of stuff at lightning speed and “just do it”, where us mortals have to go “oh, well look at that”. Again, if I did a TON of this kind of stuff, I’m sure after stumbling on this 5 times I’d remember it forever.

As for your question, I think you’re looking at it backwards. you’d see Gmaj9 written and play that shape, the way you’d see Bmin7 and play the same shape. They’re named different because they have to be logically named for the entire composition and take into consideration the rest of the progression, key and other elements of the orchestration. Bmin7 will not sound like a major chord without the G in the bass. That G could be played by the trombone, who knows. With this kind of stuff, especially if it’s faster you play less notes and voice it where and how you can. Given this, I can also argue the other end and seen shit written very complex for no good reason whatsoever. Why in the hell would anyone write in C flat? come on. Why not just write in B? But it is out there and you still have to read it.
 
Yeah learning the melody really well has helped me a lot when improvising. That and having the changes down and knowing where all the notes are on the fretboard cold.

P.S. Oh and almost forgot, 3rds and 7ths
7/3 resolutions are a big deal in jazz. I started learning that stuff and understand it but dont know it cold.
 
Been following this thread with interest (taught myself a couple new chord shapes thanks to Ed), and noticed a couple of those shapes can be called by different names (no surprise.)


I was wondering if anyone would mind explaining why you'd use one vs. the other. I'd expect it has something to do with context...

Examples:
GMaj9 & Bm7
F#m7b5 & Am6
I go against the grain here, while it the are cases the bass note might tell the function it’s always context that really decides. What comes before and after and the melody is the context.

All chords have pluralities.
In your A-6 or F♯ø case you can add rootless D9, or C6♭5, or B7sus♭9, or A♭7♭9♯5

So even without a bass note just playing this on the top 4 strings.

X x 4 6 6 6

X x 4 5 5 5

X x 3 5 4 4
Just about anyone will hear it as Eb-7 A♭7alt D♭△9

Whereas this...

X x 5 5 5 5

X x 4 5 5 5

X x 4 4 3 5

Most uf not all will hear as A-7 D9 G△9

And speaking of pluralities look at °7 chords the root can be any of it's 4 notes so this

X x 3 4 3 4 can be F°7 B°7 D°7 G♯°7
Or rootless E7♭9 B♭7♭9 D♭7♭9 G7♭9

Same with augmented stuff.

Like
X x 5 6 6 5

if you move this In whole steps that initial
A7♯5 now can not just be B7♯5 but also
A9♭5(omit3) then up a whole step
A9♯5 again whole up
A7♭5 up whole
A9♭5♯5(omit3) up whole
A9♯5 up whole
 
Last edited:
Back
Top