Well, the RG/Jem came out in '87, which was the same year Charvel switched to a Floyd licensed tremolo (JT6), so I don't think that was the reason. I think Ibanez just had a much more aggressive A&R program and ended up signing a lot more players.Those first made in Japan Charvels were great apart from the Kahler trems . They didn’t have a choice though because the Floyd was contracted to Kramer. Ibanez did the right things and made a Floyd paying the license. The RG and Jem ended it for Charvel taking so many top players. By the time Charvel got everything in place 88/9 it was too late.
It was the reason. I talked to many users and endorsements at the time . The JT6 was the reaction but nobody liked it. It wasn’t until the Schaller came out and they started to fit proper locking nuts that the guitars were actually what people wanted in the first place. A good friend of mine was an endorser at the time and he played early custom ones with Floyds.Well, the RG/Jem came out in '87, which was the same year Charvel switched to a Floyd licensed tremolo (JT6), so I don't think that was the reason. I think Ibanez just had a much more aggressive A&R program and ended up signing a lot more players.
It was the reason. I talked to many users and endorsements at the time . The JT6 was the reaction but nobody liked it. It wasn’t until the Schaller came out and they started to fit proper locking nuts that the guitars were actually what people wanted in the first place. A good friend of mine was an endorser at the time and he played early custom ones with Floyds.
Were you there? Non of the endorsed players used the standard guitars. You actually couldn’t buy guitars like most used. The model series sold well at first. But artists switched and sales started to slow. The toothpaste logo versions were the best spec . You would not believe how many floyds conversions I did on these in this time. The JT6 studs could take a real Floyd but the nut conversion was problematic because it could not look stock due to actual differences in the neck on a Floyd or Kahler factory guitar.I'm sorry but the idea of "no one liking" Charvel/Jackson in '87 is just ridiculous.
The very point I am making.It's funny you guys arguing about the J-Charvels from IMC since the ones folks actually dug were the San Dimas Charvels and Jacksons all after Charvel sold the biz to Jackson.
Those early 80s super Strats with the unfinished necks were it for of us back then.
The later stuff is meh
As far as the artists using the US Custom Shop guitars vs the MIJ line, that's true. Still is, for the most part.Were you there? Non of the endorsed players used the standard guitars. You actually couldn’t buy guitars like most used. The model series sold well at first. But artists switched and sales started to slow. The toothpaste logo versions were the best spec . You would not believe how many floyds conversions I did on these in this time. The JT6 studs could take a real Floyd but the nut conversion was problematic because it could not look stock due to actual differences in the neck on a Floyd or Kahler factory guitar.
The MIJ line were supposed to be production versions of their most popular instruments. The quality was high but the thick finish on the necks and Kahlers only was a problem. I lot of metal guys switched to Ibanez.As far as the artists using the US Custom Shop guitars vs the MIJ line, that's true. Still is, for the most part.
That's different than abandoning Charvel/Jackson "because of Ibanez" though.
I don't agree "a lot of metal guys switched to Ibanez". Not at all. If you look at big metal names in the 80s like Slayer, Megadeth, Anthrax, Metallica, etc.. Jackson and ESP were pretty dominant in that style.The MIJ line were supposed to be production versions of their most popular instruments. The quality was high but the thick finish on the necks and Kahlers only was a problem. I lot of metal guys switched to Ibanez.
Even on Jackson custom shop models you couldn’t have a Strat head and they would only fit a Floyd if you sent them a new one . Then they wanted you to only have Jackson pickups.
But it happened with sales and yes some of the bigger names stayed playing the Charvels and Jacksons that you couldn’t actually get.I don't agree "a lot of metal guys switched to Ibanez". Not at all. If you look at big metal names in the 80s like Slayer, Megadeth, Anthrax, Metallica, etc.. Jackson and ESP were pretty dominant in that style.
Even for Hard Rock, Def Leppard, Ratt, Dokken, Ozzy, Dio, Van Halen, Crue etc... not a lot Ibanez players there. Lots of Kramers, as well as ESP and Jackson..
Ibanez was more prominent on the instrumental side like Vai, Satch, the Shrapnel guys etc...
Ibanez was certainly an important brand in the 80s and still is, but the notion that there was a massive exodus of players towards Ibanez is not true.
Oh you could get them it was just insanely expensive.But it happened with sales and yes some of the bigger names stayed playing the Charvels and Jacksons that you couldn’t actually get.
No I mean most of the options that players wanted were off the table from 86. They reduced the degree of custom to such a degree it was almost a production instrument. They were big on graphics but don’t ask for off brand parts.Oh you could get them it was just insanely expensive.
But shit was/is stupid expensive on all US custom stuff outside the US.