Ed DeGenaro
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,676
Or folks could just ask for an explanation.It's actually not that tough. Maybe we could start a little basic theory thread one day.
Or folks could just ask for an explanation.It's actually not that tough. Maybe we could start a little basic theory thread one day.
Isn’t everyoneI am the hotdog in your mom's hallway.
damned autocorrect
![]()
Seeing that the intro is a Gm riff based on the Gm Blues scale and harmonised in 4th.I wanna know what they call the 6th chord played in Smoke on the Water. What's that all about, in 'theory-speak?'
If you really wanna make a case for it it’d be an incomplete Db7 which is a tritone sub for a secondary dominant (G7) leading to C.That's not what I meant. I know how to name chords.
I mean, like how they're discussing chords in terms of a 'home key', and calling them a iib, or backdoor dominant (whatever the heck that is), or a tritone, etc.
Finally, someone is talking sensibly.Now going by how this thread started with referring a pool of notes to the parent scale instead of a tonal center the by the OPs logic Smoke On The Water would not be in G minor since the note are from Ab major/G locrian.
Overthinking simple things is what killed rock.
Tell you what I think killed it, one thing is audiences expecting a repeat of what the artists did.That’s in Rock and Roll A. Overthinking simple things is what killed rock.
I think I’m underthinking though.That’s in Rock and Roll A. Overthinking simple things is what killed rock.
Truth.For starters: To call the piece of music discussed here "rock" is possibly a bit of a wide stretch.
Just sayin...
You say that as if I’m the only one that looks at it that way.Truth.
But the bottom line here is the OP decided common terminology wasn’t lining up with his gobbled together terminology and vented against it.
And most of us pointed out …it’s in A end of story.
You say that as if I’m the only one that looks at it that way.
I get what you’re saying.You're likely not. But that isn't necessarily a good thing.
As said before: Use whatever works. But once you start communicating about whatever musical content, IMO it's a decent idea to resort to the most common denominators.
Gobbled together meaning:I get what you’re saying.
I will take issue with “gobbled together” as if it’s not methodical.
I get 2nd language mulliganCobbled![]()
This is the same argument on a different subject. I guess we just define things differently. What i mean is it’s not makeshift, it’s purposeful and methodical.Gobbled together meaning:
To put something together in a makeshift way.
Which is precisely what your “system”.
I guess I just don’t get how it’s easier to communicate by saying this song is in A major but there’s an Em⁷. My way for the verse would be 5 2-⁷ 1⁹ in D. I think everyone would know what that means. I will accept the admonishment and further explanation though.But that was not the point but rather that you felt the need to start a thread about something being wrong that is right.