You just can’t trust online information

As I’ve shown if 5 of X leads to X it’s a 5of. Otherwise it’s a scale degree.

If you have a 2- 5 of X it’s written (2- 5)ofX. Or you can have a (2° 5)ofX for a minor two five.
That’s really no way to communicate anything.
This woke discussion started cause you were claiming a tune that’s in a is in D.
Yet everyone on a band stand would tainted if you called it in D
 
That’s really no way to communicate anything.
This woke discussion started cause you were claiming a tune that’s in a is in D.
Yet everyone on a band stand would tainted if you called it in D
Works for me. 🤷‍♂️

What is meant by “woke” and “tainted”. I’m not catching the lingo.
 
I think i may be able to make a good case for using my charting style. If I were the only one using this I’d question myself more. Now I’m just questioning myself a little bit.
 
Really, it's "whatever works". But as I need to communicate about sheets (and sometimes functions) sort of regularly, I rather stick to whatever conventions there are (even if some are just dumb).
 
Really, it's "whatever works". But as I need to communicate about sheets (and sometimes functions) sort of regularly, I rather stick to whatever conventions there are (even if some are just dumb).
Yes. And you’re right, sometimes it would make sense to write 3⁷ instead of 5of6- such as 3ˢᵘˢ⁷ to 3⁷ may be easier than (5ˢᵘˢ 5)of6-.
 
Yes. And you’re right, sometimes it would make sense to write 3⁷ instead of 5of6- such as 3ˢᵘˢ⁷ to 3⁷ may be easier than (5ˢᵘˢ 5)of6-.

And fwiw, IMO it actually makes sense to use roman numbers for scale degrees, simply because latin numbers are the common thing to indicate chord extensions. I mean, 66 is pretty unclear whereas VI6 isn't.
 
Yes. And you’re right, sometimes it would make sense to write 3⁷ instead of 5of6- such as 3ˢᵘˢ⁷ to 3⁷ may be easier than (5ˢᵘˢ 5)of6-.
I always write it that way. But I also assume I don’t have to explain Funktion.
I mean if someone dient know a bIImaj7 has the the same function as iim7b5 then the conversation needs a few beers and a sit down
 
I mean if someone dient know a bIImaj7 has the the same function as iim7b5 then the conversation needs a few beers and a sit down

I would actually disagree as the bII root is taking one of the important notes away from the IIm7b5, namely it's root.
For me, a bIImaj7 is a more open sounding variation of a bII7 (tritone sub).
 
Fight Lol GIF by Odd Creative


This place is part of the Internet. Just saying. :idk
 
Back
Top