What's the scoop on MIM Charvels these days?

paisleywookiee

Rock Star
Messages
5,366
Kinda interested in a couple of their fiddles, the DK22 SSS, and one of the others. Are they still struggling with QC, or has it gotten better?
 
I've just played a couple in stores here and they seemed very well built. But my hands does not agree with the neck profiles.


1695315835983.png
 
I had a DK24 2pt for a year and change. They are pretty decent guitars were pretty decent QC. I like the hardware and pickups they offer out of the gate. It took a few months of tweaking the guitar to get the tuning stability in order. A big part of that is me not really liking a floating tremolo.

Biggest problem for me was the super thin and flat neck, exactly as described above. It was so uncomfortable to play. I have small hands too because I'm only 5'6" but I prefer a medium neck instead.
 
I say try one, or a few. They make a lot of varieties of Superstrats. It may or may not
be your thing. I didn't like the Ibanez AZ I bought and had issues with it from a build
perspective. I have had some turdy Gibsons and Fenders, too.

I prefer the Charvels I have over my PRSes at the moment. :idk

We all have to kiss a few Frogs to find our Princes of a guitar. Some of them are just frogs.
Others become something special. Maybe not to others, but to us. That's all the matters. :beer
 
I can say after the Usual MiM shit QC this is an absolute killer axe
So much so that ill be getting the DK-24 Soon
But I do love my DK-22 They do come with SD pickups but ill be swapping them for Dimarzio's soon
As for the Neck no its not a Ibanez Wizard II or III neck its 12-16 Compound super comfortable to play for me

Charvel neck shapes are slimmer and narrower than traditional guitar necks with comfortable rolled fingerboard edges, optimized for high performance


DK 22.jpg
 
Charvel neck shapes are slimmer and narrower than traditional guitar necks with comfortable rolled fingerboard edges, optimized for high performance
Depends on you definition of traditional. Most Fenders up to like 1987 were 41.3mm wide, while Gibson stayed at 43mm mostly for the LP's and still does. Charvles are 43mm. (Or 42.86mm to be exact). I'm fine with slim, but not with the pronounced shoulders in their neck profile.
And they seem to use the same neck profile on every damn guitar they make.
 
The Qc is mostly good. A modern MIM is actually better built than an 80s USA . Occasionally the edge of the fretboard is a little under or over beveled . If you’re ok doing a final inspection and trusting yourself to notice any issues there is no better guitar for this money.
 
I had a Charvel so cal style 2 - QC was fine but ultimately I ended up selling it as the neck profile was little too flat for me and the pickups (fishman open core) were a little uninspiring.

A Schecter thin c neck is one of my favourite neck profile.
 
Depends on you definition of traditional. Most Fenders up to like 1987 were 41.3mm wide, while Gibson stayed at 43mm mostly for the LP's and still does. Charvles are 43mm. (Or 42.86mm to be exact). I'm fine with slim, but not with the pronounced shoulders in their neck profile.
And they seem to use the same neck profile on every damn guitar they make.

Really no telling how a particular profile will sit in any one individual's hands. All kinds of different players
like and enjoy all kinds of different neck profiles. I felt like the Ibanez Prestige AZ had a flatter profile with
broader shoulders than the Charvel Dinky neck profile. And Jarick here fells differently. :idk

Just one of those things you kind of have to get into your hands and try for yourself over taking the yay or
nay from randos on Gear Forums. :beer
 
Back
Top