Achilles
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,972
Why exactly? And yes, I'm genuinely curious. What exactly peaked your interest?
Why do you feel the need to question other people's commentary or observations about the unit?
Why exactly? And yes, I'm genuinely curious. What exactly peaked your interest?
Why do you feel the need to question other people's commentary or observations about the unit?
Because I'm interested. As easy as that.
Comes across off putting from where I'm sitting.
He used to lurk on TGP if i recall correcty.
Didn't he even present the unit by himself over there?
that's because I'm busting nonsense at the same time
I like the concept. I like the technology - SPICE style models at electronic component level. I like that the supposed latency is less than 1ms. And tbh I really like how it sounds in the soundcloud clips. Remains to be seen how it feels though but considering that the device is supposed to mathematically model the circuit I suppose it's promising.Why exactly? And yes, I'm genuinely curious. What exactly peaked your interest? There's barely any sound clips, let alone decent ones, the website is looking like a shady business, the 8ms of latency you get from his wireless system aren't exactly a great "buy Smoothound!" ad, either. So what else is it?
I like the concept. I like the technology - SPICE style models at electronic component level.
I like the technology - SPICE style models at electronic component level.
I like that the supposed latency is less than 1ms.
And by the way this is an absolute departure from what people call "component based modelling".
Isn't that more or less what pretty much all modeler makers are using?
Not really.Isn't that more or less what pretty much all modeler makers are using?
I think it was the first yt video he posted.That'd be impressive but where does it say so?
Just like that. I posted some information in the Tonex thread but people would rather use made up terms to sound smart.How so?
Not an argument in favor or against.Admittedly, the SC demos sound pretty good. But it's still not that other modelers wouldn't sound as good.
I’m having a very hard time reconciling this with the alleged 1ms latency. Is the SIVA running a massively overpowered processor in comparison with e.g. FAS, etc?tl;dr, no. Most "component" modelling products out there actually model different signal path sections (low-pass filter, gain stage, etc.) which then get connected together. This can yield very accurate results with relatively low DSP overhead, but requires a lot of manual work in the form of circuit analysis and live measurements.
SPICE involves modelling the actual underlying circuit, end to end - and doing this for audio in real time is no easy feat. It however means that you can more or less dump a schematic in and get a functioning model out, with little tweaking.
All Boss devices are 1ms or less, it's not impossible.I’m having a very hard time reconciling this with the alleged 1ms latency. Is the SIVA running a massively overpowered processor in comparison with e.g. FAS, etc?
Neither here nor there. The specific point I’m addressing is that granular, SPICE-level, per-physical-component modeling described above is more computationally intensive than the algorithms used by competitors. You wouldn't expect to take this on and arrive at significantly lower latency. I'm not saying it isn't possible; I'm saying that another variable has to move in one's favor (hardware, serious optimization, etc.), and I'm wondering what did. (Or whether something here hasn't been fudged/ misrepresented.)All Boss devices are 1ms or less, it's not impossible.
A) Is that Freddie Mercury??Laxu, Sascha and Mbenigni when they land in a UI thread…
LFG