guillaume_pille
Newbie
- Messages
- 8
Well you're not wrong but it's not really feasible unless you limit the choice to a couple specific cabinets or if you offer amp modeling with the cabinet baked in (for example the cabinet that goes with the head supposedly). The same way you would do a capture of amp +cab with Kemper or NAM or QC, ending up in giving you no access whatsoever to any of the real world parameters.Makes sense. Hopefully they can shift towards real cab loads, amp+load box is easier for anyone to do and is somewhat of a compromise in itself.
To me it's not more of a compromise to use a defined load that we know on average will work VS using one cabinet (lets say a 4X12 closed back with V30) load that will have no more sense the minute you strap an IR of a 1X12 V30 open back. The number of combinations to capture to make sure it makes sense all the time would be, well, infinite. :)
So it's not just about how easy it is to work with (and yes it is easier not to have a screaming cabinet in a room) but more about the fact that with our library of 700+ dynIR we want to maintain the compatibility.
To finish on this, after doing cabinet captures for 20 years, we are often surprised about some amp + cab combinations that nobody could have think of and can make sense in the context of the specific sound you're searching for.
If the idea is to have the exact same sound you get with your real gear amp + cab + cabinet + microphone + micr preamp etc... doing a capture of everything at once is probably the safer bet.