NDSP Quad Cortex

I don't think the "QC effects are good" is the hill to die on 🤣 it has other things going for it but let's be real, effects is not one of them.

For example, the delays and reverbs in fractal are on par with the higher end real life effects pedals. That's why you get these devices, no? To accurately recreate analog gear (for the most part).

The spring reverb on the QC should just be removed
I agree..many of them do need to be improved and more added. I never disputed that. I don't use reverb and use a few simple delays, so it suits my needs. Like I said, YMMV. If you want great delays and reverbs, don't buy a QC is solid advice.
 
I agree many of them do need to be improved and more added. I never disputed that. I don't use reverb and use a few simple delays, so it suits my needs. Like I said, YMMV. If you want great delays and reverbs, don't buy a QC is solid advice.
And that's cool. But there are others on here who delay and reverb is their thing and are very knowledgeable about these effects. At the end of the day, use what works for you, and if that's a simple delay and reverb, great!

But to say someone like Orv, who is well versed in analog gear, is trolling just because they are calling out the poor reverbs and delays is silly. You even said yourself they need to be improved and you only use the most basic one.
 
And that's cool. But there are others on here who delay and reverb is their thing and are very knowledgeable about these effects. At the end of the day, use what works for you, and if that's a simple delay and reverb, great!

But to say someone like Orv, who is well versed in analog gear, is trolling just because they are calling out the poor reverbs and delays is silly. You even said yourself they need to be improved and you only use the most basic one.
Exactly everyone has to use what works for them
I love the Fractal stuff and have been using it for years
But I don’t really need 60 reverbs or 75 delays for my use case
Some people love mod effects and I don’t really use them , I can’t stand chorus on distorted guitars for the most part or a phaser , I like some RUSH but I would never want that tone
But as you said people’s needs and requirements are different and as long as your making music and have a tone that inspires you that’s all that matters
 
This just reminded me, QC has no dedicated dual detune. I feel personally attacked.
That is true , nor does it have momentary switching IIRC ?
That’s a pain if you want to do the EVH unchained thing or a slicer type effect
 
I agree..many of them do need to be improved and more added. I never disputed that. I don't use reverb and use a few simple delays, so it suits my needs. Like I said, YMMV. If you want great delays and reverbs, don't buy a QC is solid advice.
The problem is that the QC is directly competing in the high-end with units that have actual great effects. If it was an amp/drive model/capture box at a lower price point, I'd not have had any issues with having to supplement it with outboard fx.
 
Of course a DD8 or many other "delay pedals" are better. Because, uh..that's what they were designed for. Delays. The Analog Delay sounds fine in the QC. Quite good actually. Have you actually owned a QC? Or do you just like to troll the QC threads across different forums/groups?
Having owned the QC at release, compared it to the Helix Floor and Fractal FM3 side by side...the delays and reverbs don't stack up. I wouldn't go as far as calling them complete crap like Orvillain, but I would call them alright at best.

Tape delays are my favorite, and for example Fractal's delays in this category are capable of doing everything my Strymon Volante does, but it requires much more work to get that out of them because of the complication of adjusting the Fractal. Hard to beat dedicated pedals there tho...

Line6 Helix is somewhere roughly on the same line as my Source Audio delays. Really good, but not blowing my socks off. Use without complaints.

Quad Cortex unfortunately comes in far behind, where it was never "ooh I love what I'm getting" but more like "eh, that's quite alright, could be better" stuff. Effects were the primary reason I sold mine, which came as a surprise for me to be honest - I wouldn't call myself super picky about anything but tape delays and plate reverbs.

I'd expect a high end modeler's effects to be up there with some of the top names in pedals, even if they may not do the quirkiest fx designs or won't have the ease of use.

You don't have to play P&W stuff to enjoy a great plate or hall reverb, or a nice analog or tape delay.
 
I just want NDSP to give the Bogner XTC 101b model
Blue and red channels that were promised at launch
If they could nail that amp I would be a very happy camper
We got Captures of all the channels in the box. These sound good. We got Preamp captures and full amp captures. I was messing with the preamp capture going into a Mesa Boogie 2:90 capture, and into a Friedman SS 100. Sounded really good
But it would be sweet to have a model of the amp as well
 
Of course a DD8 or many other "delay pedals" are better. Because, uh..that's what they were designed for. Delays. The Analog Delay sounds fine in the QC. Quite good actually. Have you actually owned a QC? Or do you just like to troll the QC threads across different forums/groups?
I have actually owned a QC. In fact, I was one of the first people in the UK to get one. First 10 or 20 people I'm sure.

I owned it for about 9 months.

Your reasoning is flawed. The QC was designed to do amp modelling, amp captures, and effects. It fails in several key areas in terms of algorithm quality and breadth, and doesn't compare very well when you put it up against other products that aim to cover the same ground, even in the price-range.

The fact that a DD-8 can beat the delay sounds of a QC, and the fact that an RV-5 can be the reverb sounds of the QC.... is not a particular testament to those pedals, although they are good. It is more an indictment on the quality of effects in the QC, given the length of time it has been on the market. The longer time goes on, the happier I am that I sold it.

But also, yes. I do like t troll the QC threads across different forums and groups. So... lol.
 
You don't have to play P&W stuff to enjoy a great plate or hall reverb, or a nice analog or tape delay.
100% this. I have a lot of respect @GTR37 so I'm not going to ream him out. But I don't think P&W is a particular barometer. I'd put post-rock out there as an example of effects-orientated music that requires better than what the QC gives.
 
And for what it is worth, when I had the QC:
1711970100055.png


This is the board I put together. Honestly? It sounded fucking amazing. But there were some issues - the QC itself doesn't have particularly good effects loops. There are significant level drops throughout the signal path that mean your effects don't get the level they should. I measured it at a 3 or 6dB drop in level, if I recall correctly. One guy on the NDSP forum told me to try using balanced TRS cables instead, but I never got around to it.
Every single pedal there absolutely slayed the comparative effects on the QC. I had a lot of hopes for that setup, but along with the above, there were significant limitations in terms of midi switching too, that were not clear at launch. I don't know if they actually fixed any of that???

Given the gear I had at the time:
1711970254361.png


The QC as a holistic device, really didn't stand a chance.

Lot of these pedals got shifted on once I got my Axe FX III, but now I'm back in pedal land with the Meris units:
1711970318518.png

I fully admit it! I do have higher expectations than your typical AC/DC guitarist!
 
Back
Top