northern_fox
Roadie
- Messages
- 453
^^^ In my view, you have perfectly summarized the key point about NAM and every other emerging potentially open-sourced AI modeler.
These are the very reasons why Tonex is such an awesome sounding and feeling and supported unit and eco-system.
Then think about when it was released and made available to buy and use to "the public" - in short, its still in its absolute infancy and will doubtlessly get better and better and better etc.
I know this is not a popular view from those that are all-in on the "open sourced" approach, but i.m.h.o, the only real chance that NAM-like products have to compete at a "pro" level, is for a "big-player" to adopt and incorporate and develop them into their own software and hardware products - unless/until that happens, its a free and fun tech to play with.
Ben
The funny part is, NAM isn't really a product in that sense and hasn't really been developed towards being one. I know I've already said it here, but this is *still* a project focused on the tech more than anything. The notoriety it's picked up recently has put it on a lot of people's radar as a "competing solution" to big companies and commercial offerings, but it wasn't really meant to be that - that's more of the expectation of the greater community now that they've discovered it and started asking for many features / use cases / etc. I think to a certain extent that expectation has now shaped how it will grow going forward in some ways now and it might become more user oriented.
There was never a "plan" to build a whole ecosystem like tonex, ndsp, etc have - all community borne ideas which are truly amazing to see coming to life, but you'll also have to take the whole thing from the wider point of view that this kind of project differs from what most users are used to seeing.