Kemper Profiler MK 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 490
  • Start date Start date
To each their own, but until 2.0 has a chance to be compared to the others we still really don't know. Don't trust YouTube videos or influencers. The reason Michael Britt profiles typically sound the best in a mix is because he is also a touring musician.

I will say, for amp tones it's a wash between all of the companies at this point. I've heard MK1 Kemper profiles that demolish QC and Helix Stadium, and I've also heard the exact opposite. How good the Kemper sounds depends so much on the user, what mic's they used, how they placed them, what preamps were used, etc. People capturing with a cheap $100 audio interface aren't going to produce "pro" level profiles. QC and Helix come with models so they have other avenues.

For effects, I'm sorry - Kemper leads by a considerable amount. Helix is second, QC is a far third.
Honestly, it is this kind of fanboyism that just gets up people's noses.
 
what is a "pro" level profile?
For me, a great profile (paid or free) is one that works well over different pickup combos and different input levels and feels right even on different guitars.

Now, not even all tube amps manage that, so not sure how fair that is.

I like a profile that has good tone and a good set of efx tastefully applied.

Note, none of my criteria has anything to do with accuracy. It's about how it sounds in the mix for me.
 
Note, none of my criteria has anything to do with accuracy. It's about how it sounds in the mix for me.


What kind of mix? You and I have probably very different ideas of what would fit good in a mix. So that would be a completely subjective thing. Someone that put up a capture that I love you may absolutely hate. And vice versa of course. So I really can’t put my stock in what someone else says sounds good in a mix.
 
Back
Top