paisleywookiee
Rock Star
- Messages
- 7,448
You know what we need to talk about?
You know what we need to talk about?
Keep waiting for the Triaxis, and keep enjoying those thumbnails!1) Overly-serious or shocked face Youtube thumbnails.
2) The lack of a new Triaxis from Mesa, still!
In the age of modelers, it's amazing to me the company that made the first real analog modeler isn't keeping up with the times. Instead they're releasing old tech - 2 channel non-midi amps at ludicrous prices. IDK what they're doing. At least the Mark VII is a great modern amp.Keep waiting for the Triaxis, and keep enjoying those thumbnails!
Yup. I’m not exactly delighted with Mesa, at this point.In the age of modelers, it's amazing to me the company that made the first real analog modeler isn't keeping up with the times. Instead they're releasing old tech - 2 channel non-midi amps at ludicrous prices. IDK what they're doing. At least the Mark VII is a great modern amp.
Meanwhile Synergy is thriving, Soldano has diversified to rack gear again along with pedals and Synergy modules, Fryette is thriving in rack gear. Mesa is stuck creatively for some reason.
ftfyYup. I’m not exactly delighted with Gibson, at this point.
Yup. I’m not exactly delighted with Mesa, at this point.
Yeah, I mean that's really who they're taking marching orders from. The whole "we'll continue to operate independently" was obviously horseshit.ftfy
Did you see the video Randall Smith put out where he talked about not understanding why the IIC+ was re-released when the VII has in his opinion the best version of the IIC sound?Yeah, I mean that's really who they're taking marching orders from. The whole "we'll continue to operate independently" was obviously horseshit.
I also don’t understand the people who claim they can’t hear a difference from the amp.
Starts at 3:29
I never said "as good as it can be" I said "as good as it really should be"Yes. Good enough means good enough. It’s not code.
You are the one who is projecting a need for “enough” to also cover “as good as it can be” and then becoming indignant when others don’t adopt your custom definition and push back at how you demand your perspective be the benchmark.
There's been quite a few people over the years who have claimed they can't hear a difference. I'm not keeping a tally though.I don't think anyone claims that, at least not generally. There might be some profiles that sound and feel indistinguishingly close (or rather identical) whereas others don't.
There's been quite a few people over the years who have claimed they can't hear a difference.
I'm aware of that. But it's really something I don't care about. Seriously, for me there's good enough and not good enough. And if there's improvements to render good enough better or not good enough to good enough, I applaud such efforts. As easy as that.
"It doesn't matter."
"The audience will never know."
“No one can tell in a mix anyway.”
“If it sounds good, it is good.”
“Nobody cares but guitar players.”
“It’s 95% there—good enough.”
“You’re just being too picky.”
“You’re supposed to tweak it after profiling.”
“It’s not meant to be exact, just close.”
“That amp had bad tubes or a weird mic position anyway.”
“Try profiling it again—maybe something went wrong.”
“It’s close enough for live shows.”
“Why lug around 80 lbs of gear for a 5% difference?”
“I sold all my amps and don’t miss them.”
“You can’t beat the convenience.”
“Tone is in the fingers.”
“Music is about emotion, not fidelity.”
“Chasing tone is a waste of time.”
“You're just romanticizing analog gear.”
“I A/B’d them and couldn’t tell the difference.”
“You’re imagining the difference.”
“Placebo effect—Kemper wins blind tests.”
“You must not know how to dial it in.”
Apologia for dogshit.