Is the HX Stomp a Good Audio Interface (For DAW Use & Playback Only)?

Messages
1,500
Hey all,

I’ve seen this question float around in bits and pieces, but I wanted to put it out there more directly: Can the HX Stomp hold its own as a dedicated audio interface, specifically for DAW-based production and playback? Not talking about tracking guitars, not talking about using it for amps or effects. Just treating it as an audio interface for making music inside the DAW, mixing, and general system playback.

I’ve done a fair bit of digging and wanted to sanity-check my findings against the real-world experience of folks here who actually know what they’re listening to.

TL;DR:

It works. But if you don’t need the amp/fx features, a Scarlett or MOTU will probably serve you better.

What I Found:
  • Drivers & Latency: HX Stomp performs decently here. It’s class-compliant and works fine on most systems, but it’s not as rock-solid or low-latency optimized as interfaces designed specifically for studio workflows. MOTU in particular tends to have better performance/stability in this range.
  • Converter Quality: Not bad — but not exactly transparent either. It’s clearly optimized for guitar tone shaping rather than pristine, neutral playback. Interfaces like the Scarlett Solo/2i2 or MOTU M2/M4 generally offer flatter, more accurate conversion that’s better suited for mixing and referencing.
  • Routing & Monitoring: This is where it gets clunky. HX Stomp routing is clearly built for pedalboard-style setups, not multi-channel DAW production. Direct monitoring isn’t as intuitive or flexible as what you get with, say, a MOTU + CueMix or even Focusrite Control.
  • Workflow Fit: If you’re using the HX Stomp anyway (for guitar or portability), it’s a nice bonus that it can also act as an interface. But if you’re buying it just to use as an audio interface, there’s really no advantage — and a few disadvantages — compared to something purpose-built like a MOTU M2 or Scarlett 2i2.
Any things missing ? Incorrect? Correct?

Important:

I’m NOT comparing it to an RME Babyface or Universal Audio Apollo. Totally different tier. This is strictly about the budget-to-midrange category.

Final Thought:

If you’re already using the HX Stomp in your rig, sure it’s good enough to double as an interface. But if you’re focused purely on making beats, producing, or mixing in a DAW, and you care about things like driver stability, converter transparency, and routing flexibility… something like a MOTU M2 or even a Scarlett will get you there with fewer compromises.





Would love to hear from anyone using the Stomp long-term in a production setup. Any surprises or caveats I missed?

Hope all is well with everyone!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elf
The HX interface is great for zero latency when using/recording it as a guitar rig. Anyone recording guitar and bass with a vst drummer like ezdrummer will be just fine

It struggles with multiple virtual (midi) instruments though.. so if you're talking full production with a lot of tracks then a dedicated interface is a must.

I use the helix interface for all my guitar tracking.. but vocals, synths and mixing duties go to my main interface because latency
 
The HX interface is great for zero latency when using/recording it as a guitar rig. Anyone recording guitar and bass with a vst drummer like ezdrummer will be just fine

It struggles with multiple virtual (midi) instruments though.. so if you're talking full production with a lot of tracks then a dedicated interface is a must.

I use the helix interface for all my guitar tracking.. but vocals, synths and mixing duties go to my main interface because latency

Ah yes

So this is actually my situation:

- multiple channels for drums
- Bass (sometimes modo bass of a simple 3xOSC)
- Some samples

Often i end up around 11-15 channels (and of course all the Fxs like EQ, compression, delay, reverb etc .. the usual suspects)
 
Ah yes

So this is actually my situation:

- multiple channels for drums
- Bass (sometimes modo bass of a simple 3xOSC)
- Some samples

Often i end up around 11-15 channels (and of course all the Fxs like EQ, compression, delay, reverb etc .. the usual suspects)
It depends on how you're using those drum and bass vsti's

If it's copy pasta midi tracks you'll be fine. Recording live midi however, is where you run into the latency problems. I'm more in the 30-40 track range, but adjusting buffers while recording and setting back when it's time to mix is totally doable in most situations imo. There are plenty of workarounds, like I'm sure you could use a mic pre into the stomp and pretty much have all you need.
 
It depends on how you're using those drum and bass vsti's

If it's copy pasta midi tracks you'll be fine. Recording live midi however, is where you run into the latency problems. I'm more in the 30-40 track range, but adjusting buffers while recording and setting back when it's time to mix is totally doable in most situations imo. There are plenty of workarounds, like I'm sure you could use a mic pre into the stomp and pretty much have all you need.

Ohhh no! I am using samples for drums! So no vst in this case

also not using omnisphere.

But what about this part:

  • Converter Quality: Not bad — but not exactly transparent either. It’s clearly optimized for guitar tone shaping rather than pristine, neutral playback. Interfaces like the Scarlett Solo/2i2 or MOTU M2/M4 generally offer flatter, more accurate conversion that’s better suited for mixing and referencing.
 
Not sure if you need an extra recommendation, but I highly recommend the Audient ID14mk2.
A solid interface.

Yeah my friend uses that one. Big fan of it.

I actually hated that one 🤣. I had two in a row that the big knob broke off, and their support sucked. Sweetwater took care of me, and I ended up selling the second replacement.
Sounded good though.
 
I actually hated that one 🤣. I had two in a row that the big knob broke off, and their support sucked. Sweetwater took care of me, and I ended up selling the second replacement.
Sounded good though.
How did you manage that? Mine is solid. It's just a screwed on knob. If it was loose you could have tightened it.
I'm sure crazier things have happened at sea, but yeah, this is not something I've ever heard before.
Their support is great usually too - they even have a fellow guitar gear nerd working for them now (Adam Steel), who is a great person.

Ah well.
 
How did you manage that? Mine is solid. It's just a screwed on knob. If it was loose you could have tightened it.
I'm sure crazier things have happened at sea, but yeah, this is not something I've ever heard before.
Their support is great usually too - they even have a fellow guitar gear nerd working for them now (Adam Steel), who is a great person.

Ah well.

I’m gifted, I guess. It’s not that something broke, it’s how their support handles it, and at least with me, they were unresponsive and unhelpful.
 
Ohhh no! I am using samples for drums! So no vst in this case

also not using omnisphere.

But what about this part:

  • Converter Quality: Not bad — but not exactly transparent either. It’s clearly optimized for guitar tone shaping rather than pristine, neutral playback. Interfaces like the Scarlett Solo/2i2 or MOTU M2/M4 generally offer flatter, more accurate conversion that’s better suited for mixing and referencing.
The only thing "colored" on the stomp is the guitar input, not the audio converters.. they're generic. Use the return if you want a flat input
 
The only thing "colored" on the stomp is the guitar input, not the audio converters.. they're generic. Use the return if you want a flat input

Okay noob question:

How do I do that? New preset.. and then?

Edit: I think I already do it neutral >>>

I am running USB into the Stomp and XLR out to my monitors, so i am not using the guitar input at all, which is the only part that adds any “color.”??

The audio converters in the Stomp are clean and neutral (is what you are saying). So my whole signal path is flat.

So then there is no real reason to upgrade to a motu or a Scarlett? (Because it wouldn’t be an upgrade)

And an Apollo twin ? Would that be an upgrade or just overkill for my use case?
 
Last edited:
I think even the $100 interfaces will likely have better performance if you're trying to track with low latency plugins. If you want to track using the HX modeling it would work fine.
 
Okay noob question:

How do I do that? New preset.. and then?

Edit: I think I already do it neutral >>>

I am running USB into the Stomp and XLR out to my monitors, so i am not using the guitar input at all, which is the only part that adds any “color.”??

The audio converters in the Stomp are clean and neutral (is what you are saying). So my whole signal path is flat.

So then there is no real reason to upgrade to a motu or a Scarlett? (Because it wouldn’t be an upgrade)

And an Apollo twin ? Would that be an upgrade or just overkill for my use case?
correctamundo

until you need mutlitrack recording abilities or are recording a live digital drum kit.. you're good.
 
Also FWIW I think just about every modeler has been adequate for basic recording and playback. Even the janky USB audio of the Kemper that was added a decade after it was released worked alright. None of them have been really low latency with plugins though, even things like QC and Axe FX 3. A basic MOTU or Audient works much better for that.
 
Back
Top