MirrorProfiles
Rock Star
- Messages
- 3,243
I use one of these with my studio monitors. Excellent stuff but for that money I’d be going for a nice valve poweramp to drive a guitar cab any day of the week.Not suggesting that anybody would buy the following Class D amp to power a guitar cab because it's very expensive and probably wouldn't have enough power available for that anyway. Also, it would never end up in a L6 powered HX device for that cost reason because it wouldn't be viable; but I'm linking the Hypex NCx500 module here just to demonstrate that not all Class D power amps are trash or sound the same.
The THD figures are excellent.
Hypex NCx500 Class D Amplifier Review
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Hypex NCx500 NCOREx reference design amplifier. It was sent by the company and kindly assembled by our local expert, @Rick Sykora. As you see the sample is a "monoblock" configuration (one channel) driven by Hypex SMPS1200 switching power...www.audiosciencereview.com
There are a good deal of poorly designed Class D amps out there and / or they often contain cheap components and are usually built to a price point - and that might be the majority of them; so I can see why there is a dislike of them out there.
The point here is that the topology of Class D isn't inherently the problem in terms of the dislike that they receive. It's just a topology that reflects an approach to amplification.
In terms of cost, I'd still like to believe there's a sweet spot out there and the odds are improving all the time.
For me it’s not so much about the technology or type of amp being an issue, it’s the fact it’s driving a guitar cab and we are used to driving those with valve poweramps that have a very interactive response between cabinet and amp. Maybe it’s possible to make a nice solid state amp with something that approximates these behaviours? Or you just go with any tried and tested valve poweramp that sounds and behaves “right” from the off?