Mongillo19
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,703
I've heard of this amp before so it's a step in the right directionI want to see if the folks who said it was a good amp now call it shit cos I bought it....LOL
I've heard of this amp before so it's a step in the right directionI want to see if the folks who said it was a good amp now call it shit cos I bought it....LOL
I've heard of this amp before so it's a step in the right direction
Look what you made me do now! It's all your fault. Seller claims it's "as new"
View attachment 11114
View attachment 11115
It's not a "Baby Plexi" but it is a good amp. Take it from a former Plexi owner.
I did use a Rage at one point as a distortion pedal! It brought DA BROOTZ!
I did use a Rage at one point as a distortion pedal! It brought DA BROOTZ!
Under your username it says "Shredder".I have an origin 20h and honestly there are so many Marshall’s I’d recommend over it. At best it can sound OK, but it’s a dumb circuit IMO. It’s a rubbish master volume because if you want a gainy tone then you need it cranked, at which point it’s very loud. The circuit has too few gain stages to feel like a Marshall, and yet they wasted an entire 12ax7 for the fx loop (why they didn’t use a good solid state loop and use the valve for a gain stage is beyond me).
Vintage Modern and DSL’s are up there with ANY marshall out there. If you want something small that is good at different volumes, Friedman offer way better circuits for the money.
The Shredder thing is just a forum quirk of how many posts you've had, unless you identify as a Groupie :) I am certainly not a shredder.Under your username it says "Shredder".
So I'm guessing you're basically a metal player, favouring high gain amps. Correct me if I'm wrong.
The Origin is not a high gain amp. It's not a JCM, DSL, etc. It's voiced to sound more like the early JMP's.
If high gain is your thing then don't get the Origin.
If you want the early plexi crunch, the Origin will get you in that ballpark.
It's definately not an "ok" amp.
I'm not saying that you can't get useable tones out of it, or that it isn't enjoyable. I just think its a poor choice of amp to go for when there are many other Marshall's that cover the same ground (and much more). I still own a lot of Marshalls old and new, and the origin is probably the only one I wouldn't recommend UNLESS its to use as a donor to mod.The points you make are valid.
As someone who has owned Plexis, JCM 800's, and the Origin 50, all I'm saying is don't write off the Origin as a badly designed amp.
![]()
Why do they sound so much better? Why can’t I stop thinking about them?
I keep replaying that scene in Parks & Rec when they have the hamburger cook off.
I spend all this time dialing in my digital rig and I’m so excited about how good it sounds.
Then I flip on a lowly Marshall Origin at a shop in between shows and immediately it sounds 100x better with zero effort…
Guitar Center has 48 month financing on Marshall’s right now… I think I’m gonna have to pick something up
Is there a good link to read about the origin of the Origin? I thought the whole point of it was to be mostly clean as a “pedal platform” because “pedal platform” was the buzzy catch phrase 10 years ago.I'm not saying that you can't get useable tones out of it, or that it isn't enjoyable. I just think its a poor choice of amp to go for when there are many other Marshall's that cover the same ground (and much more). I still own a lot of Marshalls old and new, and the origin is probably the only one I wouldn't recommend UNLESS its to use as a donor to mod.
2 of these cost £1100, all others less than £1000 and often around £500 or less
- JMP 2203
- JMP 2104 (2204 combo)
- JMP 4104 (JCM 800 era 2204 combo)
- 1981 JCM 800 2204
- 1989 JCM 800 2204
- 1989 JCM 800 2210
- 1988 2554 Jubilee
- JMP 4145 Club and Country
- JMP 2144
- JMP 2150
- 1959HW
- JMP 1992 Super Bass
- DSL 100H
- JCM2000 DSL 100
- Vintage Modern 2266
- Valvestate 8100
- Valvestate 8080 Combo
- Origin 20H
Its quite interesting to read/listen to what one of the designers of the Origin has said about what the amp started out as in the design process and what it finally got released as. The design changed as it slipped through other peoples hands and the original intention of the circuit got confused along the way. IMO the design is poor, because:
- an entire 12ax7 (2 gain stages) is sacrificed for an FX loop. This means it is 1 valve short of what a standard JTM45 or 1987/1959 preamp has to work with.
- the resulting lack of gain stages mean the only way to get crunch is to turn up the MV volume
- at this point, the amp is VERY loud, and the FX loop will be getting distorted by the PI and power amp and sounds like mush.
So it may as well have just been a standard JTM45 or 1987 type circuit in the first place. There's enough examples of them sounding good, and I'm not saying they sound terrible or have no use. I'm glad you dig yours and I'm not taking anything away from that. I just think other amps offer much more than the Origin at much better value
There’s various posts/youtube videos from Santiago talking about it, as well as just looking at the schematic and amp itself to see what’s going on.Is there a good link to read about the origin of the Origin? I thought the whole point of it was to be mostly clean as a “pedal platform” because “pedal platform” was the buzzy catch phrase 10 years ago.
Thanks. I’ll check it out.There’s various posts/youtube videos from Santiago talking about it, as well as just looking at the schematic and amp itself to see what’s going on.
It’s fine as a pedal platform (much more useful used with pedals than without), but so are a lot of amps. I recently picked up a JMP4145 and that wipes the floor with it as a pedal platform IMO. Even if you ONLY wanted a pedal platform, I’m not sure what it offers over other amps they’ve made.
The points you make are valid.
As someone who has owned Plexis, JCM 800's, and the Origin 50, all I'm saying is don't write off the Origin as a badly designed amp.
![]()
Also the 20 and 50 are almost black and white comparatively. I couldnt tell you why but the 50 definitely has more depth and and more of that "bark" that everyone talks about for Marshalls. I have a/b'd them for many hours through the same 2x12 of V30's to reach that conclusion. back when I had my first 50H I bought them both to compare. The 20 sounds like a toy compared to the 50, at least in the room it does. No offense to anyone who has the 20