HOTONE AMPERO STOMP / STAGE NOW " IMPORT " NAM FILES

BenIfin

Shredder
Messages
1,102
Details here:-

Hotone Stomp / Stage and NAM Import ***

*** Import NAM Files with Ease
Sound Clone technology supports converting NAM files into .clo format for use in your device. This conversion can be done in the latest versions of both the Ampero II desktop software and Ampero II Stage app. The upgraded Sound Clone ensures better preservation of the original NAM tone characteristics while optimizing compatibility with Hotone's digital gear.

As always the proof of the pudding will be in the eating ie: does the import-conversion alter the NAM files tone and sound, and how does it null test compared to the same NAM File in the NAM Player.

Given Hotone's size and relative expertise, one would think it will convert and sound and null test a lot better than the Sonulab and Pocket Master Pedals (?)

Totally Non-Cheesy Official Launch Video
 
Last edited:
Awesome! The captures on their own website were a very mixed bag. This opens it up for so many more.

The capture limit being increased to 30 also gives much more room to experiment.

I have a good NAM capture of my BluGuitar Classic channel so I will try how it compares to Tone Catch.

Might try capturing the Mark V as well.
 
Details here:-

Hotone Stomp / Stage and NAM Import ***

*** Import NAM Files with Ease
Sound Clone technology supports converting NAM files into .clo format for use in your device. This conversion can be done in the latest versions of both the Ampero II desktop software and Ampero II Stage app. The upgraded Sound Clone ensures better preservation of the original NAM tone characteristics while optimizing compatibility with Hotone's digital gear.

As always the proof of the pudding will be in the eating ie: does the import-conversion alter the NAM files tone and sound, and how does it null test compared to the same NAM File in the NAM Player.

Given Hotone's size and relative expertise, one would think it will convert and sound and null test a lot better than the Sonulab and Pocket Master Pedals (?)

Totally Non-Cheesy Official Launch Video
WOW now this is HUGE! I hope the NAM files use way less CPU than their clone files.
 
Awesome! The captures on their own website were a very mixed bag. This opens it up for so many more.

The capture limit being increased to 30 also gives much more room to experiment.

I have a good NAM capture of my BluGuitar Classic channel so I will try how it compares to Tone Catch.

Might try capturing the Mark V as well.

Would be very interesting to hear your thoughts on how your NAM capture of your BluGuitar Classic channel played back in NAM Player -compares sound and tone wise- to the same NAM Capture being imported-and-converted into the Hotone (?).

WOW now this is HUGE! I hope the NAM files use way less CPU than their clone files.

So....how do the converted NAM profile sound compared to the source?

^^ These are the "$64,000 questions" as they say :) If the importation and conversion process of the NAM file into the Hotone format makes zero [or audibly zero] tonal and sound difference when compared to playing the same NAM Capture via the NAM Player ... this could very well almost overnight become "the" NAM box everyone has wanted and been waiting on for so long.
 
Would be very interesting to hear your thoughts on how your NAM capture of your BluGuitar Classic channel played back in NAM Player -compares sound and tone wise- to the same NAM Capture being imported-and-converted into the Hotone (?).
I plan to use the Hotone as audio interface, run DI via USB to NAM plugin and record the same playing through the Hotone with the same profile loaded. Should be the closest like for like.
 
Here's a comparison.

Signal chain:

Guitar (Carvin C66 with Suhr Doug Aldrich pickups) -> Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp -> USB -> Macbook Pro 16" M2 Max -> Logic Pro.

Capture:

BluGuitar Amp 1 Mercury Edition Classic channel -> Bluetone Loadbox -> Audient EVO 8 audio interface.
NAM 1000 epoch capture made using Tonezone3000.

Recording setup:
  • Input 7 (Ampero 2 DI signal) -> NAM plugin (mono -> stereo) -> Bus with ML Sound Lab MIKKO 2 cab sim.
  • Input 1/2 (Ampero 2 main outs) -> Same bus with cab sim.
I monitored the DAW output from the A2 Stomp headphone out

With a bit of reverb from UA Capitol Chambers, and UA LA-2 output compression:


Same clips, bone dry:


Thoughts:

The low end is totally different on the Ampero 2. I need to try other captures, maybe 100 epoch captures or something. The straight NAM capture in the plugin sounds much clearer.
 
In other news, it seems the captures are now more demanding, or they've limited the capture blocks to one. You can only put one Clone (formerly Catch) block into a preset. Otherwise it seems you can use about the same number of effects.
 
Last edited:
Here's a comparison.

Signal chain:

Guitar (Carvin C66 with Suhr Doug Aldrich pickups) -> Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp -> USB -> Macbook Pro 16" M2 Max -> Logic Pro.

Capture:

BluGuitar Amp 1 Mercury Edition Classic channel -> Bluetone Loadbox -> Audient EVO 8 audio interface.
NAM 1000 epoch capture made using Tonezone3000.

Recording setup:
  • Input 7 (Ampero 2 DI signal) -> NAM plugin (mono -> stereo) -> Bus with ML Sound Lab MIKKO 2 cab sim.
  • Input 1/2 (Ampero 2 main outs) -> Same bus with cab sim.
I monitored the DAW output from the A2 Stomp headphone out

With a bit of reverb from UA Capitol Chambers, and UA LA-2 output compression:


Same clips, bone dry:


Thoughts:

The low end is totally different on the Ampero 2. I need to try other captures, maybe 100 epoch captures or something. The straight NAM capture in the plugin sounds much clearer.

Even on my phone speakers the difference was very apparent. Difference in low end yes. The original NAM capture definitely sounds less muffled.
 
Woah.. that sound comparison is way different than I expected, and I wasn't sure even what I was expecting.
But to me it's as if they've added a 'bass boost' (like you'd find on one of those super duper AIWA hi-fi systems from the 90s with loads of random eq presets that literally no one needed).

Crazy different. But I guess it may be a good thing for all those people who want over emphasised 'big bass response'.
 
I'm not entirely sure how you set it up, but if I read correctly you used the interface of the Ampero for all of this, so instead you could maybe try and compare by recording a di track through your normal interface into your DAW and then reamping that through both the Ampero and the NAM plugin and seeing if that helps. Also, I would leave out any post processing as that's not really helpful to compare (eg. reverbs etc).
 
Back
Top