LOL. I ruminate on this question most days!
Neurospicey! I love it!
I'm definitely going to adopt this label for myself.
I don't know quite what I am, or what my neurological pathology officially is, but I'm definitely "different".
Fortunately, I work with a bunch of people that are either on the soft end of the autistic spectrum, or ADHD and even a genuine OCD sufferer (i.e. not in the way that people colloquially use that term when they aren't really OCD) - that's the software world for ya! So my quirks don't really seem to register as out of the ordinary with my work colleagues.
This resonates with me. For the longest time, I felt bad about not being a multitasker. As a young man, I recall my first job's appraisal process where I was rated for multi-tasking. For years afterwards I felt bad that I didn't feel I was a multitasker and that I was somehow less useful in my roles.
Then one day, I just came to the realisation that this multi-tasking yardstick was bullshit and moved on! Why should I be rated on this, when it has no value in the way that I work and I still get results?
I now tell anyone that will listen "
multi-tasking is overrated" - that's my motto; and there's an implicit, "if you disagree, fight me!" tacked onto the end of my personal statement.
An odd thing I've observed though: over the years, nobody disagrees with me any more. Nobody disagrees that multi-tasking isn't a virtue and is overrated, and that I prefer to hyper focus on a task, complete it to the fullest extent and then move on, never needing to look at it again. I've brought this up with a bunch of managers in the industry and now they agree with me, which I didn't expect based on my early experiences of workplaces where they didn't.
Society seems to have moved on - maybe because of the attention span attrition attributed to mobile computing, social media etc., that has already been noted in this thread; so I'm a better fit for the world now more than I ever was before.