- Messages
- 7,189
I don’t think this is going to be priced anywhere near those devices tbh.
What’s the over/under? $1,000?
Friedman IR-Load
- Thread starter DrewJD82
- Start date
I don’t think this is going to be priced anywhere near those devices tbh.
What’s the over/under? $1,000?
- Messages
- 12,909
Very curious on the price of this. For once I’m being skeptical out of the gate, but due to my experience with the PS170 or BAM200, I’m not expecting much from this. If it’s the same old Class D with new shit in front of it….meh.
Blix
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,979
The Pete quote refers to the IR-Load, not the pedal. :)
Chocol8
Rock Star
- Messages
- 3,024
A price!
Chocol8
Rock Star
- Messages
- 3,024
They both supposedly use the same new Synergy ML tech and propriety amp modules. The Wampler version being a compact pedal without the load and only 50 watts per side.
Chocol8
Rock Star
- Messages
- 3,024
For the Friedman, well over, for the Wampler, well under. (My guesses)
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 23,218
The BAM in this case is the weight required in my wallet that will cover the purchase price
- Messages
- 7,189
Agreed, the first thing I thought for the Friedman was $1,500, but that a big price for a load box and class d power amp. The AI mojo would need to be immense.
Maybe it’s way cheaper.
Blix
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,979
With Dave and Pete signing off on this I'd expect it to be a whole lot better than PS170/BAM's, anything else would be a huge bummer!
AlbertA
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,915
Good class D is fantastic
Class D?! Knee jerk reaction, but I will try and be positive.
MatrixClaw
Roadie
- Messages
- 276
The Boss TAE is $1400 and the UA Ox is $1300. There's no way this thing is coming in under $1500 
MTB1973
Roadie
- Messages
- 525
That is what I have heard, that it has come a long way. Any good examples? I know my needs are a bit niche, needing stereo.
AlbertA
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,915
Check this one out: https://www.hypexdirect.com/products/amplifier-kits/nilai500-stereo-kit
OrganicZed
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,036
Class D?! Knee jerk reaction, but I will try and be positive.
The bad reputation of class-D is mostly due to consumer grade implementations made to achieve a particular price point and weight rather than the ultimate sound quality. Peak output power ratings are often advertised rather than the rms continuous power output capabilities of the amplifiers. The real design inherent issue with class-D is that badly designed filtering circuitry can allow the switching nose to be in the audible range.
Boudoir Guitar
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,684
Or even this: https://www.buckeyeamp.com/shop/amplifiers/hypex/nc502mp/2_channel
Tests preeeeeeeetty darn similarly and is already built.
Boudoir Guitar
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,684
On the one hand, pretty cool. On the other hand -- that winds up being a lot of boxes and weight to...run a digital model of one of the more critical parts of the tube amp you are wanting to use? I get why a lot of people will love using this; I just don't get why that's remotely more appealing than just running a good digital modeler into a good power amp.
nicolasrivera
Roadie
- Messages
- 647
How many times have we heard things like this with solid state stirile poweramps...
Blix
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,979
Considering the source there's a fair chance this is better.
- Messages
- 12,909
I’m hoping so! I figured the power side of things were no different than the preamp side and all it was going to take was someone legitimately INTO it to put the time in and develop it in the same way Cliff did with modeling back in the day.
I think as a result of hearing Dave shit on modeling over the years, I can’t tell if he’s finally at the point of acknowledging “Yes, it can be great if the time is put into it” or if he’s just adapting to the digital world regardless of what he thinks of the actual product. Regardless, I’m stoked to hear it and am definitely hopeful it blows everyone away.
