AlbertA
Roadie
- Messages
- 920
In the world of real time pitch shifting that 13.6ms figure is state of the art i believe.
Boss Poly Shift XS-1 and XS-100 Official Thread™ With Video(s)
- Thread starter JiveTurkey
- Start date
Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 9,758
Might be. But then, where's those slightly more complexed pristine clean faux pedal steel chords? That's a thing I'd really like to do with such a thing. Apparently it's still not good enough for that kinda thing.
And fwiw, what I'm really wondering about is how Boss manages to keep latencies so low on their SY units (even when feeding them with a stock pickup signal), just to completely crap out once it's about pitch shifting.
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 21,104
Im using it with an amp/pedalboard rig; not another modeler. But absolutely agree on that figure being far too large if that were the case.
Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 9,758
Fwiw, I'm getting the same kinda latency figures from my modeling rig compared to a traditional rig by kinda "compensating" via the distance of the monitoring source. I'd very likely place any real amp/cab at least a meter or so further away from where I'm standing than where I place my FR wedge.
Anyhow, regardless of the exisating rig, 13+ ms on top are too much, even for live situations.
Chocol8
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,810
How do you shift a pitch without reading in enough of the original signal to know what the pitch is? For the low E on a standard tuned guitar, a single full cycle of the fundamental will take 12.5 ms. I am not sure if they need to see a full cycle, but there has to be a limit between the lowest input frequency the pedal can work with and the lowest possible latency.
Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 9,758
This is not how things work (at least not for any "simple", non-diatonic pitch shifting).
First off: By that token, when you strike your low E string, it'd take at least 12.5ms for any impact to reach your ear (plus the time it takes to be sent through whatever devices and the air). And we all know that this isn't the case. Yes, your ear will only be able to faithfully recognize the fundamental of the note after that amount of time, but that's not the only thing to exist in a guitar string's tone. The attack (which you may or may not call a "pitch-less" impact) is almost instant. And that's what defines the timing of a note, not it's decay's fundamental pitch.
Static pitch shifters don't do any analyis, they just multiply or divide the values of any incoming signal by a given amount. The best example possibly being older octavers, working with very little latencies. They just don't care about the note pitch but divide anything by 2 (or 4, in case there's a 2nd octave down option).
No. See above. The incoming pitch is completely irrelevant for any non-diatonic (or otherwise analysing) pitch shifting.
metropolis_4
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,230
The general rules of pitch shifting have always been:
- The more complex/dissonant the harmony the more it struggles.
- The cleaner the tone, the more you’ll hear the artifacts.
Remember when the Quad Cortex came out and people swore the pitch shifter was polyphonic because it sounded fine when they were playing root/5th power chords with heavy distortion?
Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 9,758
Yeah. This had me irritated way back already. I always thought distortion would bring out "harmonic issues" (I know, it's not a proper term by any means...) more than clean sounds, but the opposite is the case, it pretty much masks some of those issues.
But it doesn't stop there - some pitch shifters actually seem to work better post distortion. Which I find to be pretty weird as distorted sounds are pretty much harmonically complexed. Also, if you really wanted to emulate a detuned guitar, that obviously would have to happen straight after the guitar's output.
Anyhow, given how far we have taken technology already, it's quite weird that there's still no proper pitch shifting working well with polyphonic material *and* low latency.
Fwiw, while defenitely nitpicking, pretty much any pitch shifter is polyphonic as in that you can feed all of them polyphonic material. Just that the output of some will sound worse than others.
metropolis_4
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,230
I don’t know the technical details, but whenever guitarists talk about polyphonic vs monophonic in regard to pitch shifters it’s generally understood that what we’re referring to is the ability to track and reproduce more than one pitch at a time. Play an interval on an old monophonic Whammy and the output oscillates between the two pitches. Play the same interval on a newer polyphonic Whammy and you hear each note shifted.
There are some cool creative uses of that warble of older monophonic devices. Listen to My Iron Lung by Radiohead for example
Sascha Franck
Rock Star
- Messages
- 9,758
I'm quite aware of that definition, but there's a lot of grey area. I have an old Whammy II and it works kinda ok-ishly on certain chords (I kinda like using it in -2 mode and then "pre-bend" down, works nicely for a faux pedal steel thing), even if its not designated to work polyphonically. And then there's some polyphonic shifters warbling like mad.
- Messages
- 1,494
MSS user over on fractal said this
"I bought one this weekend and I am super impressed with it. I sold my drop tune years ago in favor of the Axe virtual capo. My needs generally don’t require a drop more than 2 semitones.
When I compare the xs-1 to the Axe virtual capo dropping c to a#, they are remarkably close. Having said that, out of the box the xs-1 sounds better. Changing virtual capo tracking to 6.5 and adding an eq after (dropping some 1k and boosting some 8k) gets them super close. They both track well and have, to my ears, similar but slight artifacting. I figured I would be sending the xs-1 back but I am keeping it. I think it sounds a little more natural than the virtual capo. Both are great IMO."
forum.fractalaudio.com
"I bought one this weekend and I am super impressed with it. I sold my drop tune years ago in favor of the Axe virtual capo. My needs generally don’t require a drop more than 2 semitones.
When I compare the xs-1 to the Axe virtual capo dropping c to a#, they are remarkably close. Having said that, out of the box the xs-1 sounds better. Changing virtual capo tracking to 6.5 and adding an eq after (dropping some 1k and boosting some 8k) gets them super close. They both track well and have, to my ears, similar but slight artifacting. I figured I would be sending the xs-1 back but I am keeping it. I think it sounds a little more natural than the virtual capo. Both are great IMO."
Boss XS-1 Poly Shifter
Bought one of these before I finished my first cup of coffee this morning. I've been a long time Digitech Drop user and super curious how this compares! It's got a couple neat tricks and can pull off a convincing chorus. I'll leave some more thoughts when it arrives next week...
Chocol8
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,810
I can see how you could do a simple shift down, but I think to do more complex shifting in both directions, the pedal has to have some ability to "look ahead" which means latency. Does anyone have a low latency polyphonic pitch shifter? Why not?
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 21,104
I hate ordering from anywhere other than Amazon at this point 
I've got wrestling metal riffs to learn
I've got wrestling metal riffs to learn
Chocol8
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,810
I hate ordering from anywhere other than Amazon at this point
Long and McQuaalude doesn’t do same day home delivery yet?
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 21,104
- Messages
- 6,508
I hate ordering from anywhere other than Amazon at this point
Dude I hear you on this. I hate the idea of using Amazon over a dedicated music company, but next-day and two-day shipping is hard to resist. Ain’t nobody got time for 5-6 day shipping unless you’re the only game in town for an item.
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 21,104
JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 21,104
If I played cleans; this is pretty impressive!
