Agree totally. Not being able to foot-switch between clean/crunch and not having independent gain/volume controls for clean/crunch sorta stinks. Limits it versatility, which is otherwise quite considerable. Ultimately that made me ‘internet feature checklist’ sell it, but I probably could/should have kept it anyway. (Needs to go back on my buy-twice list lol)
I think you have to look at when it was designed and what Mike said he wanted to achieve.
I think 86 was the original, true SLO100 (not Mr Science), 87 was a number of amps for high profile clients and 88 was full production.
What else was around in 86/87/88 that was properly 3 channels and separate EQs? The Mark IVs hadn't arrived yet.
And Mike said, reportedly that he wanted to keep the signal path as simple as possible. If you ever see inside one, its surprisingly basic looking.
The Clean mode of Normal was really just an after thought that was doable and turned out to sound real nice (although I think it needs the SRV/scoop switch to really sparkle).
I believe all clean mode is, is dumping a bunch of signal before the first gain stage. Is that kind like rolling back the guitar volume or using a volume pedal before the amp?
Anyway, that's why Mike and Bill used to recommend diming the Normal master (3 o'clock or more) then using the Normal gain as the volume, because it needed that to match the OD channel volume.
If you made, crunch/clean footswitchable, there's always Be a huge jump in volume.
Here's the kicker, because amps like the Mark II set precedent for pros having multiple same amps set up for different sounds (because shared EQ in that case), I reckon noone thought it was a big deal to have "only" crunch and OD, or clean and OD, especially when you can roll back the guitar volume on crunch mode and get it "clean enough".
It's only in the last 20 years or so that we've been really spoiled for choice with 3+ channel amps that didnt.cost a fortune and were obtainable. But by that point the SLO had become a classic, so if they had changed it dramatically, you were "messing with the magic" and, more pragmatically, making it more complex internally which Mike originally didn't want.