- Messages
- 6,249
Any frequency that would've originally been above Nyquist, but wraps back around because of a lack of anti-aliasing filtering and oversampling techniques.At what frequency?
Any frequency that would've originally been above Nyquist, but wraps back around because of a lack of anti-aliasing filtering and oversampling techniques.At what frequency?
This ^^^ In all seriousness, even though my Mary Had a Little Lamb example was silly, it has VERY audible aliasing on the highest "little lamb." It's so prevalent that it's hard to distinguish the original pitch that provided the input. I did game it a little bit though, because I intentionally chose that highest pitch as one that had the worst aliasingAny frequency that would've originally been above Nyquist, but wraps back around because of a lack of anti-aliasing filtering and oversampling techniques.
So I checked out a video Jason Sadites did comparing 3.0 to 3.1 (oversampling update). The difference is definitely audible in his raw guitar tracks. I’m just not yet convinced that someone could hear the difference in a mix.Look to to higher gain tracks before Line 6 increased the oversampling compared to after with the HX platform for examples.
In most cases the underlying music is going to be more important than the nuances. There’s some extremely good guitar work that’s been done with previous generation modelers. Though that’s not to say there isn’t a benefit to better oversampling now and into the future.So I checked out a video Jason Sadites did comparing 3.0 to 3.1 (oversampling update). The difference is definitely audible in his raw guitar tracks. I’m just not yet convinced that someone could hear the difference in a mix.
No guitar, but...
Thats the first time I've achieved an erection in .06 seconds
I call this "Mary Had a Little Alias," featuring Helix Native. (But you could do this with just about any plugin/modeler... )
Good for you , your ears are still perfect
This is more than acceptableNo guitar, but...