I might be wrong or simply partial to Gibson but I do belive that the small innacurancies that come from the production process can't be called issues.
I say that because those imperfections are expected and not somenthing has slipped through the QC check. Things like bleeding, small imperfections on the finsh, small glue residues, the way the guitar stay (or doesn't stay in tune), the headstock construction, all this kind of thngs are part of what a Gibson guitar is and, I guess, want to be.
In other words for the most part Gibson sell guitars that are built like they are intended to be and only sometimes (too often if you ask me) they fuck up and send to stores guitars with real problems.
Most of the so calle issues look like that compared to other guitars made by other manifacturers, but that's not a real apple to apple comparison in my opinion.
It's a bit like trying to compare a gourmet and a traditional restaurant. They both can serve excellent food that is presented in a very different manner and with different goals.
All that said, I understand those who won't accept what Gibson has to offer.