When do you predict the next Fractal Audio Axe iteration will drop, now that they've stated that it will be NAM-compatible?

That's a pretty fucking big thing though. If they get just that right, it will kill the component modeling market due to the time/cost factor alone. But there is also much more to be had in capturing effects and signal chains. The ability to bake a bunch of blocks down into a single capture, will open up options, especially on smaller/lower powered units.
That's a big if, considering that doing properly working parametric captures is likely to take a long time for anything with more than a few knobs like an overdrive pedal.

I'm also not convinced that capturing e.g time based effects will be a thing anytime soon...and the idea of "effects snapshot" for delays, reverbs etc is even less appealing.
 
I would be shocked if the AXE3, at least the turbo, wouldn't have enough horsepower to integrate it as is, under the either/or scenario cheaper units have.
Either use NAM or a amp model, not both. I'm probably wrong, but it would help them compete in a world where apparently NAM is supposely better than everything. (not my specific opinion, but it's out there)
 
I would be shocked if the AXE3, at least the turbo, wouldn't have enough horsepower to integrate it as is
NAM is software written for a general purpose computer, i.e. a CPU, while the Axe modelling runs on a DSP which is quite a different beast . It's kinda like saying that integrating a search bar into a book shouldn't be too hard because the book has enough pages. Well, not quite that extreme but still...
 
How about splitting the screen into two smaller displays, returning to 2u height, and adding physical support for a tablet (touch screen)?
 
It's kinda like saying that integrating a search bar into a book shouldn't be too hard because the book has enough pages. Well, not quite that extreme but still...
Probably cant add a search bar into a book because its impossible :rofl
 
Back
Top