Solarflares
Roadie
- Messages
- 115
Necro reply, but I don’t care, as you know already.Two reverbs simultaneously?
Isn't that like putting a swimming pool in the middle of a lake?
I work with the idea that every sound source in a mix should have it’s own localised ambience and stereo spread - if we are portraying it in a stereo image.
The Accutronics approach is interesting - used by Ken Scott when recording The Tubes “Young and Rich”. Everything recorded in stereo. I took that as an inspirational starting point.
So what I do, is to take my mono guitar track, and use a Waves Chambers plugin to give it some thickening and stereo-width, with short room-decay. Still in a narrow band, I then apply any delays I wish, and pan them outside that first image - which I tend to perceive as a ‘bubble’.
I then apply a longer stereo reverb to the overall image, delays included, but I reverse the pan, so that a delay on the right will reverb on the left etc.
Now, I can have that whole image as wide or narrow as I wish. So I have a bubble inside a larger bubble, with delays dancing around outside the smaller bubble, but inside the bigger one - the reverse reverb giving extra movement and drama.
As for ‘real’ spaces on guitar tracks - why shouldn’t I have the number 2 Abbey Road room available as a short thickener - and have the choice of an Austrian Concert Hall or whatever to encompass it? We are talking complex algorithms capable of way in excess of 14,000,000 convolutions. I wouldn’t be grabbing a pedal for any of that.
A rack unit maybe.
Here’s an example of what I’m talking about.
Last edited: