Soldano X88-IR

IIRC, it's because by offering such a feature it would potentially give away some proprietary FAS modelling secrets to those that would analyse such things.
It sure came off that he suggested that many years ago (which helps explain why many think so), but is now telling differently...
I may still have the notes for both.
There may have been a misunderstanding of course, or he could have changed his mind and is not worried anymore (if it would be possible).

This is the recent stance...

Cliff: "One thing I have contemplated in the past is a switch that allows you to, for example, output the preamp on the left channel of the amp block and the power amp on the right. It’s not possible to run the power amp separately from the amp block though. It has nothing to do with proprietary technology or IP, it’s an architectural limitation."

I'd love to have some 3 to 15 power amp options for the rack preamps at least (Marshall, VHT, Boogie, ...).
OTOH, I may not be at the level I could hear a very important difference... :grin

More slight derail...

For example, from early statements many people also remember the CAE was modeled with a Boogie 90/90. Then out of the blue Cliff claimed it was modeled with a Marshall (which the CAE was designed/tuned for according to Suhr). Even the wiki is still in mystery about it and people seem afraid to ask again (me too)... I'd love to have confirmation once and for all (and be sure to have a Marshall version)... ;)

One "last dream" is to have a few CAE models (incl. famous mods) in versions that Suhr actually thinks are close to his best work (he didn't seem to think so years ago). OTOH, I do trust it sounds like the one Cliff had. Well, yes no maybe, as I thought he had Frampton's but doesn't own one? (and many changes/new measurements have come after that)
Again, for me it may be more psychological. Some of you will have a better idea if it makes a big difference...

There's of course also people who owned one and say it sounds fine, but they may have used a Boogie too, or not be as strict. Overall, reading on the forum gives more the impression that people could be happier with it... (somewhat older threads at least), and questions around it seem to be ignored... OTOH, I once took note of some particular settings that would be needed, which may escape many casual users.

Just a wish. Luckily age diminishes fanaticism a little -- also because there is so much else to enjoy as well :giggle:

PS: I don't even know how the CAE sounds IRL, apart from Toto/Luke gigs.
I once borrowed one for a day and found it sounded like a** :facepalm :grin
Probably because I couldn't play it loud enough, had a wrong power amp and no V30 cabs... I had even less (tube amp) knowledge back then...
 
Last edited:
Yes easily. Great tone is timeless and the analog side can’t get surpassed by future releases. It’s like any classic tube amp. Is the SLO out of date? Never is the answer.
This is the way I feel when I moved to the Synergy side - none of the "it sounds like the real thing" - next update "I can't tell the difference" and so on.
Quite psychological really - and I'm playing more than tweaking and that is the most important thing for me.
 
🤷🏻‍♂️
the-office.gif
 
This is the way I feel when I moved to the Synergy side - none of the "it sounds like the real thing" - next update "I can't tell the difference" and so on.
Quite psychological really - and I'm playing more than tweaking and that is the most important thing for me.
You often spend and age looking for "that" parameter that will just make it right on modellers . But on the X88ir it's "right" on practically any setting and you spend your time playing instead of looking something that is ofter just not there. Yes it's subtle but it makes a bid difference to me.
 
Back
Top