Reactive Load Box?

Bumping this thread, as I'm looking for something for making captures with the QC. I don't really need any extra features, I don't think, just a load box for capture creating.

Two Notes is least expensive and easiest to get option here in Canada, it seems.
 
Not sure about availability or pricing but Fryette.
I found an older version (non-IR loading) for a good price on the Verb a while back.

_3_Power_Load_Left_93868-1521745645-1280-1280_820017-607fbf92aa84801f44316daed6e825ec.jpg
 
TubeStack said:
Bumping this thread, as I'm looking for something for making captures with the QC. I don't really need any extra features, I don't think, just a load box for capture creating.

Two Notes is least expensive and easiest to get option here in Canada, it seems.
Click to expand...
Have a look here at the 2nd page. We kinda got a good representation of the popular loadboxes going around.

Suhr Reactive Load Vs Fractal Audio X-Load

I actually really like the original Suhr RL, but I did not like the IR version at all. They seem to have nailed the reactive load part, but every IR l played on it whether stock or one I installed just sounded bad on the one I had. Maybe it was just me, but I bought a new Suhr RL IR and was...
thegearforum.com thegearforum.com

Guess stay away from the Driftwood and the Two Notes.
 
I have a Suhr Reactive Load IR and a DIY loadbox jobby that a friend made for me. I notice the DIY one rolls off the highs quite a bit. I don't know anything about the circuit used. I might measure it today actually, as a comparison.
 
Apparently I don't need one, as I can use the Slave Out on my Mesa head (while it's also connected to the cab) to make a QC capture.
 
TubeStack said:
Apparently I don't need one, as I can use the Slave Out on my Mesa head (while it's also connected to the cab) to make a QC capture.
Click to expand...
Won't it just capture the preamp, in essence bypassing the output transformer and power tubes? Imho that's where a LOT of the magic is
 
I have a Captor X and I really do enjoy the DynIRs and the Remote App.
I lack the will to browse through hundreds of slightly different IRs to get lucky.
Being able to tweak the IR in the Remote App is great and pu-retty intuitive.
Moving and mixing the mics is a bit weird, because they are fixed phase, which messes with my head. But otherwise they behave pretty predictably, and swapping an M160 for a 57 gives mostly plausible results.
The Two Notes factory presets are phasey and weird, and more for guys playing gloriously at home alone.
Michael Nielsens BHG DynIRs are Big, Hairy and Guitar, and I ended up adding the Suhr open back cab IRs for more Fendery stuff. They are all great and work in context.

I've gigged with a tube head going direct via the Captor X and recorded with it and it's always been happy faces.
Still I prefer putting up mics on cabs, whenever possible.
I mean, I have cabs and speakers and mics I like.
Finding great IRs with these exact combinations is unlikely, and I have not yet gotten around to engineer IRs with my gear that works well with my instance of a loadbox...
 
woody said:
That's a bougee scale choice.
It weights approximately 7 flacons of Chanel no 5.
Click to expand...
It has some mass.

There's a sizable finned aluminum heatsink under the power resistors & the resonance inductor that's difficult to see in the other images I posted.

O3rggxc.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Deadpan
Suhr Reactive Load Vs Fractal Audio X-Load
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
6K
LeftyLoungeLizard
LeftyLoungeLizard
2dor
Suhr Reactive Load vs St. Rock React:IR vs real cabs (Mesa 2x12, Mesa 4x12, ENGL 1x12) - measured through Behringer GI100 DI box
Replies
0
Views
209
2dor
2dor
HotRats
Captor X type of device without the reactive load?
3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
3K
HotRats
HotRats
James Freeman
Fractal X-Load Modification
Replies
2
Views
308
James Freeman
James Freeman
SillyOctpuss
Audio interfaces again
Replies
10
Views
579
SillyOctpuss
SillyOctpuss
Back
Top