Quad Cortex Mini

I think that the lack of a shared definition of "doing things right" is the issue. You're defining it as anything that results in high sales. I'm not sure that's a universally held truth.
Doing things right just means "how close did we get to the design brief/product requirements document?" - and that is not something a user can answer.
 
Yep. Note, I also called it a smart business move on their end, to be fair.

My reasoning is because this seems to me, as a result of no one at any point in time asking for a smaller QC with less footswitches, that they had a list of “Shit our customers are begging us for “ and “Shit we can cram the OS into and get it shipping” and poof, the Mini QC was born.

This isn’t a solution to a problem people were looking for, it’s not response to customer needs. And that’s likely where my issue lay; I’ll remain stuck in my viewpoint of “They should take care of the people who got them to this point first and foremost” and I’m very clearly in the minority on that thought, which I believe is part of my increasing detachment from the world around me.
Like I said, I follow all the rest of your reasoning here. It's just this one phrase I'm at odds with:

"...while not having to put any additional effort into their day to day..."

This product release clearly represents a lot of effort. More than I was aware they were putting in, certainly. "Cramming the OS" into a new box is a massive oversimplification.

As to whether it serves their customer base? It clearly serves somebody, as evidenced by its having sold out in a couple of hours. And whether the zero-sum opportunity cost of their working on it is another instance of NDSP screwing their existing QC customer base... I think (I would hope) by this point, if anyone still owns a QC it's because they like it, and they don't feel particularly screwed either way. :idk
 
Unless you’re a stockholder I don’t know why you’d give a shit what “sold out” means other than “people like it”.

Same with the price being close’ish to the QC. Since when did anyone here give a shit about threatening QC sales? :ROFLMAO:

Again, I think the fact that they built to the form factor, not a price point, is what’s badass. The “let’s increasingly bonk successively smaller versions to hit every $200 price bracket on the way down the pipe” is cool to hit a variety of players in different price brackets, but it’s also cool when a company says “fuck that, let’s build cool shit”. You can have a badass small version or a badass medium version.

Neural is on their game with this one. 💪
 
I think that the lack of a shared definition of "doing things right" is the issue. You're defining it as anything that results in high sales. I'm not sure that's a universally held truth.
It’s not the be all and end all but it’s a good indicator that they understand what a guitarist wants.

if a company brings out products and people keep buying those products, it’s pretty easy to put two and two together that they know what they’re doing. I used the words “doing things right”, it’s just vernacular not a mission statement.

Not every player ever will like their stuff, some will despise it. But if they are a top seller that tells you that a large part of the market likes what they are selling.
 
Obviously not as guitar rigs - but there's really only one reason why it's not as feasible for guitar players, namely the issue of where to place the dreaded laptop. And well, possibly because guitar players are less tech savy than keyboarders.
Otherwise, a laptop based setup could easily mop the floor with pretty much any dedicated modeler given sound, functionality and usability.
I didn’t wanna butt into you guys’ conversation but I’ve seen one band use a laptop and interface as their main guitar rig. One band sounded like total garbage to me (he was using NDSP Fortin NTS); that was waaaay back though. And Boudoir did say no one “in their right mind” so he might be right. 😆
 
Regarding the "nobody asked this" subject... I wouldn´t be so sure of that. I remember reading somewhere that the cramped footswitchews were a "meh" for someone and, if that was to be the case, he would prefer a much smaller unit with no switches, in order to use a controller.

And I also remember having that conversation with my buddy, who told me that many users were racking it and using a controller.

Actually... if I was in the market for a multieffects, in this moment I would chose the Mini over any other unit. That´s because I like NDSP more than the rest, but would have a hard time trying to use those footswitches. Spending 300-400€ more for a not-so-useful feature for me, along with the much smaller size of the Mini, would be enough for me to chose it.
 
Me making this thread

The Bachelor Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
I didn’t wanna butt into you guys’ conversation but I’ve seen one band use a laptop and interface as their main guitar rig. One band sounded like total garbage to me (he was using NDSP Fortin NTS); that was waaaay back though.

Thing is, my core sounds would be exactly the same as what they are right now. I switched to Tonex Ones for my amp duties on both of my live boards, so the same sounds I'm now happy with would be there in a laptop based setup as well.
 
My reasoning is because this seems to me, as a result of no one at any point in time asking for a smaller QC with less footswitches, that they had a list of “Shit our customers are begging us for “ and “Shit we can cram the OS into and get it shipping” and poof, the Mini QC was born.

I didn't want to bring it up before because it's really me talking out my ass speculating, but i also think the main drive behind how the QCM end up looking like it did was reusing as much hardware/software from the QC as possible - which doesn't necessarily translate into the best product for that form factor.

For example, having no stereo inputs makes a lot of sense for a multi-fx floor unit, but not for something you chuck on your pedalboard. The venerable Stomp understood this well almost 10 years ago now.
 
I didn’t wanna butt into you guys’ conversation but I’ve seen one band use a laptop and interface as their main guitar rig. One band sounded like total garbage to me (he was using NDSP Fortin NTS); that was waaaay back though. And Boudoir did say no one “in their right mind” so he might be right. 😆
And I know a band that uses TWO DESPTOP PCs with Helix Native in both, and a quite complex system based on relays and UPSs to seamlessly keep on playing should something happened to the main PC. They use it for guitar a bass, with all the effects changes pre-programmed via MIDI through Reaper.

Crazy.

:idk
 
It’s not the be all and end all but it’s a good indicator that they understand what a guitarist wants.

if a company brings out products and people keep buying those products, it’s pretty easy to put two and two together that they know what they’re doing. I used the words “doing things right”, it’s just vernacular not a mission statement.

Not every player ever will like their stuff, some will despise it. But if they are a top seller that tells you that a large part of the market likes what they are selling.
Again, I'm not debating the internal logic of your assertion. I am about as neutral on Neural as a person can be, having never even been tempted to try their stuff, but also having not developed a negative opinion of it. A friend uses a QC as his entire rig - he has no other gear at all but guitars and a powered speaker. I'm simply noting the reality that it may not reflect how everyone thinks of the term you're using, and that's the source of the conflict.
 
Yep. Note, I also called it a smart business move on their end, to be fair.

My reasoning is because this seems to me, as a result of no one at any point in time asking for a smaller QC with less footswitches, that they had a list of “Shit our customers are begging us for “ and “Shit we can cram the OS into and get it shipping” and poof, the Mini QC was born.

This isn’t a solution to a problem people were looking for, it’s not response to customer needs. And that’s likely where my issue lay; I’ll remain stuck in my viewpoint of “They should take care of the people who got them to this point first and foremost” and I’m very clearly in the minority on that thought, which I believe is part of my increasing detachment from the world around me.
They would've had this in the pipeline even back when QC originally launched is my guess. They're following a roadmap and a vision, which we don't get to see. So their decision making seems weird, but I'm going to assume they know what they are doing.

Out of interest - what is still outstanding as far as what they promised - or at least talked about in order to get people to pre-order - for the QC nowadays?? I genuinely don't know. Haven't really been keeping track. Is it just the final plugins or something else ???
 
Doing things right just means "how close did we get to the design brief/product requirements document?" - and that is not something a user can answer.
I'll bet we can come up with like 5 other definitions of "doing things right." I'm not disagreeing with your definition. I'm simply pointing out that the term is variable, and therefore a perfect nexus for an interminable Internet argument.
 
Out of interest - what is still outstanding as far as what they promised - or at least talked about in order to get people to pre-order - for the QC nowadays?? I genuinely don't know. Haven't really been keeping track. Is it just the final plugins or something else ???

Most of their plugins still don't run on the QC, and i reckon a bunch of amp models listed in the pre-order blurb never materialized. They were supposed to have TINA™ churning those non-stop.
 
Back
Top