Flux is flux. I think the error is in making the neo magnet smaller in diameter rather than smaller in depth.Some of the early neodymium speakers sounded quite awful as it wasn't as simple as just changing out the ferrite magnet for a neo of equal strength …
I found it quite funny that we have people here that like Neo cabinets but if you google it, TOP comes up with blazing hate for them.![]()
Good point!Does someone happen to know if the DV Mark speakers are made by the same manufacturerer, who makes the Jensen Neo speakers? Sica pops to my mind, but I might be wrong.
If so, someone shpuld be able to say which of the Jensen speakers are similar to the DV Mark speakers, which in turn are rather undiscussed in the community.
Quick googling says that the DV Mark speakers might be made by an Italian brand called B&C. Which would make sense since DV Mark is Italian as well.Does someone happen to know if the DV Mark speakers are made by the same manufacturerer, who makes the Jensen Neo speakers? Sica pops to my mind, but I might be wrong.
If so, someone shpuld be able to say which of the Jensen speakers are similar to the DV Mark speakers, which in turn are rather undiscussed in the community.
Guess speaker sensitivity is high with neo speakers?
Oh B&C, of course. As far as I know they have quite a reputation in the PA speaker field, which of course moved more and more towards using neodymium speakers in the last 10 to 20 years. Think, they should know their business.Quick googling says that the DV Mark speakers might be made by an Italian brand called B&C. Which would make sense since DV Mark is Italian as well.
I remember people telling in forums, that the standard Celestion Neo is more or less a Neo version of the CL80. but I have never played one, let alone in direct comparison to a CL80. Also they are really rare, and not made anymore, so if they show up on the used market, they sell for too much to just try them...Celestion should add neo versions of the CL-80 and Vintage 30.
No on both counts.I remember people telling in forums, that the standard Celestion Neo is more or less a Neo version of the CL80. but I have never played one, let alone in direct comparison to a CL80. Also they are really rare, and not made anymore, so if they show up on the used market, they sell for too much to just try them...
As for the V30 - well, isn't the Neo Vintage supposed to be a Neo version of the V30? These are quite common on the used market.
I replaced the speakers in a JVM410c combo with 2 x Celestion V Type neos. They sounded pretty good, but the amp was STILL stupidly heavy for me. Switched them back out and sold the JVM. With a heavy combo, proportionally, the neo replacements make less noticeable difference.Has anyone of you replaced their 2x12 tube combo speakers with neodymium ones?
Asking because I consider doing this to my Ampeg VT-22 at some point. There's a pair of heavy-ass Fane "Specialist" speakers in there (not stock anyway) and a weight reduction would make it slightly more bearable to lug around. I'm not the weakest guy, but we're talking 40+ kilograms of amp here, so bringing it down a notch can't hurt.
Thanks for the reply!I replaced the speakers in a JVM410c combo with 2 x Celestion V Type neos. They sounded pretty good, but the amp was STILL stupidly heavy for me. Switched them back out and sold the JVM. With a heavy combo, proportionally, the neo replacements make less noticeable difference.
In order for neos to make a significant difference, they need to be 4 x 12 replacements.
BTW, just bought a DV Mark C412 cab with 4x12 neos - 42 pounds (less than half the weight of a typical 4x12) in a compact 4x12 format. So light, the cab feels like an illusion and it sounds very nice (so far).