Searching T3000 for "TTSV10" got this result: https://www.tone3000.com/search?q=TTSV10Where can I find NAM captures made with this? Thanks
I've shared a couple pedal captures here:Where can I find NAM captures made with this? Thanks
I can't wait for someone to make a NAM player that has this ability in it. I'll probably snag one if/when it happensJust a quick bump/shoutout for how awesome the automatic level compensation is. I totally understand why some people don't really get why its helpful but here's an example that came up today.
Band I'm working with wants to reamp guitars. I'm making a NAM model of my Maxon OD820, but it's 18V and produces a really loud signal that easily clips my usual 11.4dBu input chain.
I've increased the headroom to 20.4dBu to capture it as a NAM model, and then I can use that model on my 11.4dBu input like normal, and the plugin just automatically corrects things for me, so its driving the model afterwards just as the real pedal would. To do this manually or with something like ToneX would be a massive faff and would lead me getting a different tone to what we're going for.
There's no reason for any of the existing ones not to add it, really such an essential quality of life feature IMO.I can't wait for someone to make a NAM player that has this ability in it. I'll probably snag one if/when it happens
It depends on what the dry DI contains.How well do the captures utilizing the Dry DI+amp recording work? Seems like a really easy way to make NAM captures on Tone3000
The more data / playing you put in them, the better.How well do the captures utilizing the Dry DI+amp recording work? Seems like a really easy way to make NAM captures on Tone3000
Wait, is it possible to train Hyper Accuracy models on T3000 now? It's not terribly useful for me and my geriatric Mac, but that's a cool feature!...very excited to see them add support for Hyper Accuracy.
Spec is a bit messy to read. OpenAPI spec would be a good improvement.Tone3000 just announced this too
![]()
Introducing the TONE3000 API (beta) · TONE3000
We're excited to launch version one of the TONE3000 API – a powerful new way for developers and hardware manufacturers to access the vast universe of Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) profiles and impulse responses (IR's) created by the TONE3000 community.www.tone3000.com
Not yet.Wait, is it possible to train Hyper Accuracy models on T3000 now? It's not terribly useful for me and my geriatric Mac, but that's a cool feature!
Can NAM use what is called transfer learning in AI like the GuitarML? It would be nice if it would. Also can you use hybrid models like Wavenet+LSTM (though AFAIK the NAM "Wavenet" is a little bit modded version of original)?I’ve been retraining a load of old NAM models as xSTD models. Of the many things that are awesome about this (besides the improved accuracy, tone and feel) are:
- I can reuse the existing reamped files. I don’t have to recall settings and reamp everything one by one. I simply wouldn’t do it as the time involved would drive me nuts.
- I can upload these reamped files all to the cloud and they can train simultaneously, WAY faster than locally.
- Very easy to A/B the different training architecture against the standard one because the source files are the same
IMO it’s so much more robust of a way to catalog tones. I keep thinking that it would make sense for me to be making more ToneX packs (because honestly, they sell significantly more). But my real goal is making shit that sounds as accurate as possible and it’s just so much easier and more convenient to make NAM models. The QOL upgrades from Tone3000 have really made things so user friendly now, very excited to see them add support for Hyper Accuracy.
Yes - you can use checkpoint-based training to resume training from a given checkpoint allowing for such tweaks. It's a bit niche but can be done.Can NAM use what is called transfer learning in AI like the GuitarML? It would be nice if it would. Also can you use hybrid models like Wavenet+LSTM (though AFAIK the NAM "Wavenet" is a little bit modded version of original)?