NAD (Weber attenuator)

DrewJD82

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
12,374
This popped up locally for $100 so I scooped it up, brought it home and pulled the Plexi50 into the living room to have a night of badass couch jammin’ killer Plexi tones…..

IMG_1490.jpeg


…..only to find that it attenuates maybe, maybe 6dB, so I can turn the amp from 0.0000001 to 0.0000002 now! At best I could jam with the clean tone and pedals, but that’s not too appealing to me. I want to actually utilize the dirt from the amp.

I’ll be tossing this up FS later when I get home to take some pics, I need WAY more attenuation than this to actually use it at home. The EQ adjustments are quite effective, I’d imagine at gig volume this thing is pretty killer and that’s the only volume that attenuator will allow for.
 
This popped up locally for $100 so I scooped it up, brought it home and pulled the Plexi50 into the living room to have a night of badass couch jammin’ killer Plexi tones…..

View attachment 55742

…..only to find that it attenuates maybe, maybe 6dB, so I can turn the amp from 0.0000001 to 0.0000002 now! At best I could jam with the clean tone and pedals, but that’s not too appealing to me. I want to actually utilize the dirt from the amp.

I’ll be tossing this up FS later when I get home to take some pics, I need WAY more attenuation than this to actually use it at home. The EQ adjustments are quite effective, I’d imagine at gig volume this thing is pretty killer and that’s the only volume that attenuator will allow for.
With the level most folks actually need to attenuate, I think "load and then re-amp" is always going to be the better approach. Attenuators seem to work okay when the cab is giving most of the load and the attenuator is just padding it down a little. Once you're attenuating a lot, the attenuator is now working as the main load on the amp and the cab is just kinda along for the ride. In either event, you've got this weird scenario where the amp is loaded by these two very different things running in parallel.

I'd way rather have the consistency of a fixed load with the variability being how much I'm juicing that with power amp post load.
 
I still recommend the JohnH attenuator if you can solder and the prebuilt version Fromel Lotus if you can’t. The design maintains close to the correct impedance curve all the down to -31 db. You still have fletcher munson effects and no pants flapping, but the amp behavior and tone are maintained well.
 
I still recommend the JohnH attenuator if you can solder and the prebuilt version Fromel Lotus if you can’t. The design maintains close to the correct impedance curve all the down to -31 db. You still have fletcher munson effects and no pants flapping, but the amp behavior and tone are maintained well.

I second that! I love mine, it’s become an indispensable part of my rig. I get the sounds I want at any volume I need.

I just spent a month playing these shows where the sound engineer told me he wanted a silent stage and no amps. I told him to just trust me and used my JRT cranked into overdrive with my LP and with my JohnH I was able to pull the volume down to where I surprised him. He said it sounded amazing in the house and he had no trouble balancing it.

I actually rarely even use the lowest settings because they’re too quiet
 
How does the 50 watt version compare?

The two big differences, one can OUTPUT 100w vs 50w (I believe both can handle 100 watt amps as a load) and the 100w has the switchable channels option so you get two different volume, presence, depth options that are foot switchable.
Also the PS-2 has speaker outputs for two cabs but the PS-100 only has a jack for one with the other having been replaced with a jack for switching between channels.

fryette-ps-2-21_78791_6.jpg
PS100_Back__86144.1628106385.jpg
 
Back
Top