- Messages
- 6,356
Right. So if you don't know, don't worry about it.
You can set a valve amp to the same volume that any other amplification can be set to; assuming you buy the right amp.
Right. So if you don't know, don't worry about it.
That'll wake the baby. Certainly
hahaha! I think we need to go and make a big boy thread somewhere else! But yes... love it!
Sure, but then it comes down to whether you are happy with that sound. I find that the lower the volume goes, the less the tube amp tends to impress, even if run through say a Fryette PS. Volume itself is always a big part of the experience, and I don't mean you need to rattle windows.The thing is....
If you can play a modeller at home, or a solid state amp at home, and get some level from it from a speaker.... then you can do the same thing with a modern valve amp. Just pick the right one.
Which again goes back to how much that will cost you, and if the end result is any better than just using a good modeler into headphones, with everything else they can do. Even tube amps with built-in IRs and headphone outputs tend to lack e.g room reverb capabilities.If you can't do it for a valve amp, but you can do it for a modeller or a solid state amp, then you're really doing something wrong.
If you're headphones-bound, there are ways to get your valve amp plugged into a loadbox and to then feed your headphones with an IR applied to it.
Today, there are no barriers to using a valve amp at home, that don't also applied to the other bits of kit.
That is no different to any other kind of amplification setup. The lower the volume goes, the less impressive or enjoyable something is. This is a pretty basic guitar 101 observation. Everyone knows this. It is why at a certain point, it is BETTER to use headphones.Sure, but then it comes down to whether you are happy with that sound. I find that the lower the volume goes, the less the tube amp tends to impress, even if run through say a Fryette PS. Volume itself is always a big part of the experience, and I don't mean you need to rattle windows.
I'm just saying, compare like-for-like.Which again goes back to how much that will cost you, and if the end result is any better than just using a good modeler into headphones, with everything else they can do. Even tube amps with built-in IRs and headphone outputs tend to lack e.g room reverb capabilities.
But if you're just noodling on the couch over some TV are you really that insistent over tone?Ultimately the issue here isn't the gear. It is the ears. Ears require a certain amount of signal to hit them in the right way, in order to get the tone you want.
Hey, I agree. It is the OP who doesn't agree.But if you're just noodling on the couch over some TV are you really that insistent over tone?
As long as it doesn't completely suck for you, I'd say good enough is good enough especially for the situation.
Fuck... if I'm just twatting around with some 12 bar blues in the living room while the kids eat their dinner, I'd do that on an acoustic personally.
Right. So if you don't know, don't worry about it.
You can set a valve amp to the same volume that any other amplification can be set to; assuming you buy the right amp.
We're talking a living room amp here? Just pick something... anything!
This I can agree with.That is no different to any other kind of amplification setup. The lower the volume goes, the less impressive or enjoyable something is. This is a pretty basic guitar 101 observation. Everyone knows this. It is why at a certain point, it is BETTER to use headphones.
That's what I described doing in my previous post - both ways: tube amp vs modeler into a poweramp and real cab, set to low volume. Tube amp into a loadbox, cab sims and studio monitors/headphones vs modeler in the same scenario.I'm just saying, compare like-for-like.
Quiet valve amp versus modeller and headphones is not the same thing. Valve amp with a load and then headphones attached is the valve amp equivalent of a modeller and headphones. Modeller plugged into a poweramp of any kind and set quiet is a more appropriate comparison to a standalone quiet valve amp.
I think it's absolutely fair. Those additional features, like a whole suite of fx, can be the things that make the modeler more fun and practical, when played at those low volumes.Bringing other functionality into - particularly stuff that the OP is not asking for - is just not fair, IMHO.
They can, but will they find that extra money spent worth it, at what to me sounds like very low volumes? They aren't going to get any of the good stuff going down that low. Maybe they will like the tone more, maybe they won't, but it certainly won't represent that tube amp at its best.The full swing-and-a-hit story of it is this; for the OP's question... if you can do it with your current THR setup, then you can do it with a valve amp. Go get a small Orange Terror combo and knock yourself out. Or try a Blackstar HT-5. Those are surprisingly good all things considered, and they are a SS preamp into a 6V6 power section, iirc.