that should rattle a few walls.I just bought a 12” sub. How bad did I just fuck up?
I haven’t received it yet. It has adjustable crossover and 180 phase. I’m pairing it with 8 inch monitors, but I don’t know if I’ll have much of an option for placement other than under my desk.that should rattle a few walls.
Have you measured the room before and after? Does the sub have adjustable crossovers/phase? I’d measure your response at listening position and try moving it around and adjusting settings to find what works best
do you have a measurement mic? It depends what your goals are but I wouldn’t really feel comfortable setting up a sub without one.I haven’t received it yet. It has adjustable crossover and 180 phase. I’m pairing it with 8 inch monitors, but I don’t know if I’ll have much of an option for placement other than under my desk.
Nothing super critical at the moment. I’m not opposed to getting one though. My main goal is to lift some of the heavy lifting off of the monitors and not have to turn up as loud to get the woofers to start woofing. The 12 inch sub is recommended by the manufacturer, but part of me wonders if it’s gonna be massive and untamable. I could definitively use more low end in most scenarios; I’m hoping that it provides more punch than flub at 12”.do you have a measurement mic? It depends what your goals are but I wouldn’t really feel comfortable setting up a sub without one.
You should be OK by experimenting with crossover and polarity, a lot of subs offer more options between 0 and 360° for phase, or even full on speaker calibration and time adjustment etc
by all accounts the Behringer measurement mic (£35 or so) will work just fine. Or you could grab Sonarworks and use that for another level of calibration once you have things set up as good as you can get.Nothing super critical at the moment. I’m not opposed to getting one though. My main goal is to lift some of the heavy lifting off of the monitors and not have to turn up as loud to get the woofers to start woofing. The 12 inch sub is recommended by the manufacturer, but part of me wonders if it’s gonna be massive and untamable. I could definitively use more low end in most scenarios; I’m hoping that it provides more punch than flub at 12”.
Nothing super critical at the moment. I’m not opposed to getting one though. My main goal is to lift some of the heavy lifting off of the monitors and not have to turn up as loud to get the woofers to start woofing. The 12 inch sub is recommended by the manufacturer, but part of me wonders if it’s gonna be massive and untamable. I could definitively use more low end in most scenarios; I’m hoping that it provides more punch than flub at 12”.
What's the freq range of the MA 1 correction, does it stop when it gets to around >400Hz?slight update.
read a little about Neumann's room calibration, and people using it with non-Neumann monitors.
I happen to be using a KH750 with my ATC SCM25A's. Because I'm using 3 sets of monitors, and the size of the ATC's, its quite hard to position them optimally in my room without compromising something else. I struck a pretty good balance between the 3, but the ATC's probably suffer more than the other 2.
The ATC's were also fussier to pair with a sub, quite often I just preferred them without a sub.
ENTER THE KH750.
Managed to get that positioned and dialled in to smooth the low end response out in my room pretty well, with only one 6dB or so dip. Not ideal, but all things considered, good enough to work with.
At the weekend I stumbled on a new-in-box MA-1 measurement mic, figured I'd take a punt on it and sell it on if it didnt work well. What's nice is the calibration is handled within the sub and it can correct for non-DSP speakers. What also seperates it from Sonarworks etc is that it not only corrects the frequency response, it adjusts for phase and timing (kind of like a poor man's Trinnov). Ideally you'd use Neumann monitors as they've optimised their correction for their own crossovers and drivers, and using other speakers is going a bit rogue. Ultimately, the mic should be measuring the response in the listening position regardless. What's also cool is the software determines what can be corrected with EQ, and what nulls will just cancel out more with a bigger dip.
With the Neumann correction, my biggest dips have reduced to under 3dB across the entire spectrum. The phase is so unbelievably tight that it feels like the monitors have disappeared from my room and there is just a beatifully precise sweet spot where you can hear EVERYTHING with so much precision.
The low end is noticebly more connected than I'd ever be able to dial it in. The DSP extends the range of settings for the crossover and filters and can optimise for the room. That, combined with time algining means it just feels really tight and connected to the monitors which was quite hard to do without software helping.
What's also kind of weird to me, is that its made the ATC's sound more like how I wanted them to. I usually work more on Amphions which I just find incredibly quick to make descisions on. The ATC's are killer for recording on, and are really impressive sounding but I'd usually have to adjust some mix choices when I check on other speakers (which doesn't happen when I mix mostly on the Amphions).
I really do think a sub AND DSP is an unbeatable combination.
What's the freq range of the MA 1 correction, does it stop when it gets to around >400Hz?
Setup description sounds like it should work with any omni measurement microphone... Do you need to use their microphone, or can you use the software without using/purchasing their microphone?