Empress ParaEq MKII Deluxe

James Freeman

Rock Star
Messages
3,683
Anyone tried this as a boost?

27v internal voltage, 30dB of clean low noise boost, low/high cuts and shelving.
This might be the next best thing before adding another 12ax7 gain stage to the amp.

Right now I'm using an SD-1 to shape the frequencies and a Mosky Silver Horse for a high headroom boost after the SD-1, both pedals engaged.
I'm getting almost tube like high gain from this combination when boosting the 2203 but I think the ParaEq might replace both.
 
I didn’t keep a lot of pedals after I went all-in on Fractal but I kept all my empress pedals: the compressor, the delay and the paraeq. I have an OG para eq and it’s an amazing tone shaping tool. I did beta testing for it and I recall being pretty skeptical how useful a parametric EQ would be for a guitar player. I was so floored by it. All these years later and I still keep it around. Wouldn’t be caught without one in an analog rig now.
 
I can’t speak your level of nerdawesomeness but I used my MKII Deluxe specifically as a choose-your-own-OD with my Synergy rig. Being able to pinpoint precise hi/low cuts and the right amount and right frequency range for mid hump, on a per Syn module basis was awesome. It’s such a great piece of utility kit.

Like a lot of gear I dumped it only because I stumbled onto the world Fractal and lost my will to live need for other gear, bowing to its greatness. :ROFLMAO:
 
Not a fan of baby blue?
Limited 'Nigel Tufnel' edition at Sweetwater right now.


1717454858877.png
 
desert island pedal, as a boost it's violent, boost plus high-pass filter is laughter inducing 100% of the time

I find way more shades of usefulness in cutting rather than boosting for some reason, just the mid band alone at max q max cut, the freq knob becomes what sounds like a bazillion-way PRS pickup selector knob, in phase out of phase parallel head stand series backflip, all the tones, interpolateable, CVT, all out of single bridge humbucker

1000132114.jpg
 
Oddly, it often feels like we turn everywhere but towards EQ when chasing tone shaping devices to hit our amps with. I’ve often preferred EQ to tubescreamers for high gain tightening and absolutely love a mid/top boosted EQ through the front on my 1959 when I want things to get extra gnarly.

Seems like this should work fine for a 2203 though I guess I’m a little surprised you need that much of a boost.
 
Oddly, it often feels like we turn everywhere but towards EQ when chasing tone shaping devices to hit our amps with. I’ve often preferred EQ to tubescreamers for high gain tightening and absolutely love a mid/top boosted EQ through the front on my 1959 when I want things to get extra gnarly.

Seems like this should work fine for a 2203 though I guess I’m a little surprised you need that much of a boost.
EQ was my solution for years and years, because I really had a kind of prejudice against drive and boost pedals! I still don't really dig outright distortion pedals, but I do like a good drive now, and boosts are essential tools nowadays! But my setup used to a Laney VH100R back in the day, with an EQ pedal in front to tighten up the lows and make it teh metalz.
 
EQ was my solution for years and years, because I really had a kind of prejudice against drive and boost pedals! I still don't really dig outright distortion pedals, but I do like a good drive now, and boosts are essential tools nowadays! But my setup used to a Laney VH100R back in the day, with an EQ pedal in front to tighten up the lows and make it teh metalz.
Pretty similar story here. The EQ thing was a utility discovery - it was all I had at the time so I bent the rules to make it work, and it turned out to work very well.

That said, SD-1, Tubescreamer, etc sound awesome through my 2204 too, just a slightly different tool. If I need to cut lows or pop up the mids with no other changes I’ll grab the EQ pedal. If I need that plus additional compression, I’m probably reaching for a drive/boost. The EQ is great when you don’t want the additional compression.
 
Back
Top