Boudoir Guitar
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,831
I thought that...but then couldn't really think of who was yumming on this thing so just went with Debbie Downer insteadThat's some yuck on yum right there![]()
![]()

I thought that...but then couldn't really think of who was yumming on this thing so just went with Debbie Downer insteadThat's some yuck on yum right there![]()
![]()
Definitely a much “simpler” approach and requires less hardware cause no reamps. Wonder if the end result will be similar with 30 seconds of bashing vs the couple minute training file. It makes logical sense that a training file of some kind would produce more consistent results but I guess anything is possible in the real world.Well things just got a lot more interesting with NAM:
View attachment 31985
Check it out here: https://www.neuralampmodeler.com/post/tonezone3000-training-made-simple
I suspect it's the same principle: the more data that goes in, the better the model that gets produced (guess the "rubbish in > rubbish out" reverse applies too)Definitely a much “simpler” approach and requires less hardware cause no reamps. Wonder if the end result will be similar with 30 seconds of bashing vs the couple minute training file. It makes logical sense that a training file of some kind would produce more consistent results but I guess anything is possible in the real world.
That sounds more like the way AudioSprockets' ToneDexter works for its profiling of mic'ed guitars. In fact, I believe I could use my ToneDexter to capture cabinet profiles - to be used only within the device of course.
So all my riffs will make rubbish profiles"rubbish in > rubbish out" reverse applies too)
IIRC, I think 2 minutes audio is the minimum for wet/dry training.So all my riffs will make rubbish profiles
I’ll give it a test, might do a video. It’ll be interesting if it yields virtually the same results as a trainer files would save heaps of time. Might even be worth making my own 30 seconds training file and using that with this method, hybrid approach
This project is looking very interesting. The demo running NAM doesn't do it justice as it sounds pretty horrid (not NAM, the demo) but I bet this puppy would run Tonocracy just fine.
Paint Audio CE1 demo with NAM
It is a touch screen - If you go back and look at earlier videos on the product you'll see. They mentioned that being a small screen touch can be tricky so that a keyboard and mouse option is actually easier, which really makes sense to me as you are displaying Windows applications which are not designed for touch. Not sure what you mean by "not a mobile Windows version." It does run Windows. I'm not trying to sell the product at all. I like Tonocracy but I can run it on a small laptop just fine. And then truth be told, now that I've got a Nano Cortex, I'm pretty much done for a bit.Weird device. If this is supposed to be a floor unit, the switches seem to be way too close to each other.
But uhm, even worse, I just noticed that this isn't even a mobile Windows version. No touchscreen operation all throughout the video and all onscreen actions performed with the mouse.
And, I've read somewhere that it's an N200 CPU (not a very capable computer), with an USB audio interface connected internally (via USB, I mean) throwing around 7ms latency.Weird device. If this is supposed to be a floor unit, the switches seem to be way too close to each other.
But uhm, even worse, I just noticed that this isn't even a mobile Windows version. No touchscreen operation all throughout the video and all onscreen actions performed with the mouse.
This project is looking very interesting. The demo running NAM doesn't do it justice as it sounds pretty horrid (not NAM, the demo) but I bet this puppy would run Tonocracy just fine.
Paint Audio CE1 demo with NAM
They mentioned that being a small screen touch can be tricky so that a keyboard and mouse option is actually easier, which really makes sense to me as you are displaying Windows applications which are not designed for touch.
Not sure what you mean by "not a mobile Windows version."
And, I've read somewhere that it's an N200 CPU (not a very capable computer), with an USB audio interface connected internally (via USB, I mean) throwing around 7ms latency.
For me, it's still much worthy an average laptop (I've got a 300€ one that would wipe the floor with the CE1) with a midi controller and an interface of your choice, if you want a computer based rig.
Has anyone used Tonocracy lately? I just tried doing a couple captures and the upload goes on forever, the account sync doesn't work either (error 401)... it looks like they shut down the server.
Does this mean the project is dead? (Not that I'd be surprised...)
I forced my self to stop using tonocrazy months ago, i new it was going no where and will be dead eventually. Too bad, it was a good concept.Has anyone used Tonocracy lately? I just tried doing a couple captures and the upload goes on forever, the account sync doesn't work either (error 401)... it looks like they shut down the server.
Does this mean the project is dead? (Not that I'd be surprised...)
Yep. At least he is consistent in that regard!Classic Atomic