I don't have any interest in captures - but that unit looks cool. How're the rest of the modeled amps and FX? Interface looks nice enough.
IMO I would say modelling pretty close to a Helix sound wiseI don't have any interest in captures - but that unit looks cool. How're the rest of the modeled amps and FX? Interface looks nice enough.
Actually missed that comparison. Ampero seems to really hold against the big boys. The idea I can profile my UA pedals and basically have them available as presets + effects for gigs at a moderate price is really attractive. If I see a good Black Friday deal I may order one.If you watch the Leo Gibson video the tone catch compares well against the likes of Kemper, quad cortex and tonex
They’re not just stealing each other’s stolen software back and forth? The GE1000 is an intriguing piece of hardware.Ampero>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mooer.
I'm just not sure. And can't quite muster up the care? I might end up with a HoTone something or other maybe for "fun"?They’re not just stealing each other’s stolen software back and forth? The GE1000 is an intriguing piece of hardware.
That’s kind of where I’m at with a few of these Amazon specials. If the GE1000 does momentary switching I could leave my Helix at home for floor shows.I'm just not sure. And can't quite muster up the care? I might end up with a HoTone something or other maybe for "fun"?
I'd wager all of them. It requires relatively little DSP, it shortcuts all the R&D of having to figure out how an amp works, and the intended userbase is just happy to have good amp tones rather than obsessing over if knobs work accurately.I have zero interest in the Ampero but I do wonder how many of the budget friendly options end up with capture support in some form over the next year or two, and more importantly whether that pressures some of the white glove holdouts (fractal/L6) to wade into the tech.
Most capture users do not capture their own gear. I'd say it's most likely a fairly small group who buy capture devices specifically for that purpose.I understand the resistance, but I believe they are still operating under the faulty premise that black box modeling competes with white glove when in reality capture tech supports a totally different use case - musicians capturing THEIR gear.
Maybe, but will it be the thing most people use, if there's an equally good sounding Amp block? I feel it's a bit of an interim tech that will be surpassed by either parametric captures or something else.Eventually capture players will be just another block in every digital processor out there - like modulation or reverb.
I don't view it as a faulty premise. I see it as a developer making the product they want to. I remember Cliff saying he was not a big fan of captures. But who knows what he's got up his sleeve.I understand the resistance, but I believe they are still operating under the faulty premise that black box modeling competes with white glove when in reality capture tech supports a totally different use case - musicians capturing THEIR gear.
I’d venture to guess there’s a fair amount of stuff under the Helix umbrella (just using L6 as an example) that very few people use but gets included and maintained just the same. Synths, loopers, etc are all kind of niche features.I'd wager all of them. It requires relatively little DSP, it shortcuts all the R&D of having to figure out how an amp works, and the intended userbase is just happy to have good amp tones rather than obsessing over if knobs work accurately.
Most capture users do not capture their own gear. I'd say it's most likely a fairly small group who buy capture devices specifically for that purpose.
Maybe, but will it be the thing most people use, if there's an equally good sounding Amp block? I feel it's a bit of an interim tech that will be surpassed by either parametric captures or something else.