The Diezel VH4 (Model) Thread

MirrorProfiles

Rock Star
Messages
5,007
Not really sure which sub forum this belongs in, and maybe I'll do a version in the amp subform thats less about digital models depending on how this goes. Its been an amp thats fascinated me for years - I guess mostly because of the hype and lore surrounding it more than the sound (although I love Adam Jones's recordings with it).

1768216355550.jpeg

Much like one of my favourite amps (RECTIFIER), the VH4 has had some pretty drastic changes made to the circuit over the years. Unlike the Rectifier, these changes aren't anywhere near as well documented or discussed anywhere. Its honestly an amp Im a little bit on the fence with sonically, but the fact that so many seem to sound and behave VERY differently doesn't help things at all.

I have a 2006 model next to me, but I'm not sure what work has been done on it. It could well have been updated to more modern specs. I only have this version of the amp next to me, in an ideal world I'd have real world examples of various circuits but thats not possible. Maybe between several VH4 owners we can collate things and get a firmer grip on what the specific differences are.


Based on emulations that I'm able to compare with:

- Helix's model sounds much darker, most of the tone controls and presence behave very differently. It's OK, but I don't particularly care for whatever revision this one is. I also wonder about the channel and master volume relationship on this one as there is only one master in the model (maybe the channel volume was set to 10?). Sounds almost inverse to the real amp I have here. I've tried this model on and off for years, and to get anything that I halfway like, I'd need to get quite heavy handed with the controls. I am certain this is not down to the quality of the modelling, and more that its just a circuit revision I don't vibe with (there are other models like this too).

- STL Amphub. Very similar to Helix, although I prefer it slightly. The way the tone stack and presence work feels very similar to the Helix model. I can get it a bit more scooped and bigger/brighter than I'm able to with Helix. Again, sounds almost inverse to the amp I have here in the mids, albeit I can get this one slightly closer.

- Plugin Alliance/Nembrini VH4. Again, somewhat closer to how Helix and Amphub behave with the tonestack and presence. I can get reasonable tones out of all of these, but I have to push controls further I'd like to and they start getting a bit weird at their limits.

- STL Tonality - Borland. This one is by far the closest to the amp sat next to me. The only difference really is the way the presence control works. On this amp, the control is very subtle, on the plugin it has a wider ranging and more useful taper. I'd imagine this is a very similar circuit to the amp next to me. I think I like it best, it feels intuitive to dial in to what Im looking for.

- Fractal Dizzy V4 Silver 3. A lot more midrangey. Maybe similar to STL Amphub. If I really goose settings, I can get it sort of like the amp, but also with some obvious differences (where you can hear things being bent a bit too far out of shape). Maybe with some knowledge of circuit revisions over the years I could reshape this one into a circuit I like. Would need more information though. Maybe one we can summon the spirit of @James Freeman for. Definitely closer to this amp than the Blue model

- Fractal Dizzy V4 Blue 3. Darker, more midrange, more bloat. More like the Helix one in behaviour.

- Amplitube VHandcrafted4. Weird to me. It's sort of like some of the others but channel 3 has a bright control which I dont think I've ever seen on this channel on the real amp or any other model. To set it at "realistic" level positions produces a REALLY quiet output, so much so I have to add about 30dB of level afterwards. Its probably somewhat accurate to SOME version of the VH4 but I'm not sure I have the patience to investigate as far with this one.


The biggest difference between this real amp, and ALL of the models is that the presence knob on this amp doesn't do a great deal. I'm a little curious to look inside to see if its been serviced at all, but its not my amp (yet at least). Regardless of the fact the presence knob doesn't seem to be doing a great deal here, I really do like the tone of the real amp better than these models. It's less bloated, more open, bigger sounding in the lows and highs and more intuitive to dial in. I don't have to push anything quite as far - most controls can like in that 4-6 range and it sounds like how I want a Diezel to sound. I notice on a lot of the models, the presence and treble can start getting quite strident around 1.5kHz, and thats usually what stops me pushing those controls more (even if I want it brighter). I think this particular behaviour is something that has been tweaked over different versions though, as some do it more than others.

I think the very early versions of the circuit would be way too dark for my taste, and I think as time has gone on changes have been made that brighten it up. I suspect the presence/NFB circuit has probably undergone a few changes too.

I know there are some schematics floating around of VH4's, but also that Peter keeps them quite guarded. I'm pretty sure he might be one of the only people who actually knows what ALL of the various changes are over the years.

I can make some example clips if there is enough interest for me to do so - for this kind of thing I'd need to decide on some kind of baseline settings though.
 
Last edited:
You might recall this video:


My VH4 is a 2001 one, and matches the majority of the hallmarks he points out in his video. My amp is definitely quite dark sounding too. I'd love to shoot out the 2001, 2006, and then a more modern made one after 2015.
 
I have a newer one which ought to be with me sometime this week. I'll share some profiles to help gauge differences - guess it'll be more relevant if they're A/B-ed with a similar cab (Mesa 4x12 OS - straight preferably).

A lot of hype around the amp itself; curious how I end up liking it myself. I recall having liked the old Thermionik sims of the VH4 but didn't care much about it in the FM3 or the Helix.

The SLO I had was pretty cool but the hype around that amp didn't rub on me at all; liked the Clean and Crunch channels but the Overdrive didn't quite do it for me.
 
This isn't a shootout or trying to prove anything is better/worse/right/wrong. Just exploring where they are similar and where they are different to try and understand each more, as they just vary so much. I'm sure everyone's own personal amp will correlate quite closely to one of these models. I started off by eyeballing settings, and then tweaked a bit by ear. Sometimes tweaking further would make it weird in a different kind of way. On all of them, I had to crank the presence to get anywhere near. Settings all below.



VH4.jpg
AH VH4.jpg
Amphub VH4.jpg

Screenshot 2026-01-12 at 11.59.57.png

Screenshot 2026-01-12 at 11.56.06.png

Screenshot 2026-01-12 at 11.31.24.png

PA VH4.jpg

AT5 VH4.jpg
 
You might recall this video:


My VH4 is a 2001 one, and matches the majority of the hallmarks he points out in his video. My amp is definitely quite dark sounding too. I'd love to shoot out the 2001, 2006, and then a more modern made one after 2015.

I remember this video, great information that is repeated several times over and over. Christ.

He's got the treble and presence cranked on the old models, so thats reassuring to know. I'd need to try one in person to be sure, but based on all the models, I don't really like the tone when you have to crank things to the limit like that. They are so so dark.

Interesting! I just finished a 5 episode series in which I compare my VH4 to 5 modeling platforms with interesting results! It's such a quirky amp and hard to model!
I think a HUGE part of the "hard to model" aspect is no one really gives much information on what specific amp they've modelled. When the actual amps themselves vary so much, it makes sense that all the models do too. Yours is a newer version right?

The real amp and the fractal silver sounded like they had “the sauce” to my ears in those clips
Fractal immediately felt like it had the compression thing nailed, which is something I can't really get on with on Diezels. The Herbert had something similar, and for how I pick and the pickups I use, it can flub out really easily. It's a fun characteristic but I can't fully vibe with it.
 
I'd quite like to see the Fractal Silver model updated to the latest spec (if it isn't already) with the channel volume and master knobs, like they did with the BE100.

An example of @2112 getting close to a real VH4 Silver with the Fractal model here:



With all love to Leon, it's not one of my favourite sounding Diezel's here. Just the nature of an amp that has been changed so much over the years.
 
Just found a video of the exact amp I have on loan atm. Cool to see guts, kind of chaotic - must have been a transitional model before they changed the PCB to accommodate the tweaks:





This service manual has a mod for the NFB circuit which gives less compression and more presence to the earlier models.


In the Fractal model, it can be cool to lower the NFB and bias a bit, and maybe even turn up the master volume cap if you want a bit more sizzle/scoop and less bloat.
 
Last edited:
I remember this video, great information that is repeated several times over and over. Christ.

He's got the treble and presence cranked on the old models, so thats reassuring to know. I'd need to try one in person to be sure, but based on all the models, I don't really like the tone when you have to crank things to the limit like that. They are so so dark.


I think a HUGE part of the "hard to model" aspect is no one really gives much information on what specific amp they've modelled. When the actual amps themselves vary so much, it makes sense that all the models do too. Yours is a newer version right?


Fractal immediately felt like it had the compression thing nailed, which is something I can't really get on with on Diezels. The Herbert had something similar, and for how I pick and the pickups I use, it can flub out really easily. It's a fun characteristic but I can't fully vibe with it.

Yup, mine is pretty new. But I felt like a lot of the platforms just didn't nail the unique dynamics and string definition (while retaining a certain fatness) and that's something that I've heard with every VH4 that I ever heard, not just my own.
 
I'd quite like to see the Fractal Silver model updated to the latest spec (if it isn't already) with the channel volume and master knobs, like they did with the BE100.

An example of @2112 getting close to a real VH4 Silver with the Fractal model here:



With all love to Leon, it's not one of my favourite sounding Diezel's here. Just the nature of an amp that has been changed so much over the years.


Cool amp but I don't think I had the "oh, this is what I've been missing in my life" moment with it like playing a Recto or 70's Plexi for the first time. Keen to try a newer one but they're rare as rocking horse shit here.
 
Yup, mine is pretty new. But I felt like a lot of the platforms just didn't nail the unique dynamics and string definition (while retaining a certain fatness) and that's something that I've heard with every VH4 that I ever heard, not just my own.
That’s fair! Which model do you felt got closest to your specific amp? Where did you feel most differences were? I’d imagine a lot of emulations are based on slightly older versions (either Blueface pre-2001 style circuit of the mid 2000's circuit. I think there was a big change around 2007 and maybe another 10-15 years later? For all I know there could be lots of small ones in between. Looking at the gut shots of this amp, there's so many components soldered off the board that are presumably tweaks that have evolved over time.

Cool amp but I don't think I had the "oh, this is what I've been missing in my life" moment with it like playing a Recto or 70's Plexi for the first time. Keen to try a newer one but they're rare as rocking horse shit here.
Big time relate to this. Im so conflicted because I want to love it but it just doesn't bring me the magic I want in an amp. At best, I think they are a distinctive tone that you can almost immediately hear as being a Diezel and nothing else. My issue is, most of the time, I dont think I really need that sound (kind of how I feel with a lot of Orange amps too!).
 
Just to demonstrate this kind of odd presence control, here are some graphs of the poweramp response (using a Suhr Load) with Deep and Presence at 0 and 10:

Screenshot 2026-01-12 at 15.35.09.png
 
It's been a long time since I've tried a real VH4 and I feel about the same about it as any models I've tried. Channel 3 is cool, the rest is "alright and fine". It's in the same category as most ENGL amps for me where there's nothing wrong with it, but it's not really something I want.
 
The Helix models were the first virtual Diezel models that I played. I got into the Fractal versions later, but still gravitated towards the Helix models because they were more familiar to me.

I never played a VH4 though. I have a Crab Benzin, which is more like a loose interpretation into a small form factor. Based on that amp, I kind of wished Line 6 and Fractal had modeled Channel 2 for its version of JCM800-like tones.
 
Any self respecting Adam Jones fan wants or wanted one of these at some point. Back in the early 2000s I got to play a blue one at their NAMM booth with Peter hanging out tweaking things as I was butchering Tool riffs.

I was surprised by how dry the amp was, but also its unusual mixture of girth and definition without being overly scooped.

I’m not sure if I’ll ever actually pursue one, but I recognize them as exceptional and love having an opportunity to learn more about them.
 
Listening back to my recordings with it through the Mesa Recto OS 4x12, I'm actually kinda wanting to plug back into it now! Might fire that sucka up tomorrow.
 
Back
Top