TGF Official Amp Mesa Boogie Mark series. Join the fun and get one today!

My heaviest/most-dense Mesa was a Royal Atlantic RA100 2x12 combo I had. I used to get nervous/the sweats when I knew I had to move it somewhere. :bonk :rofl
My wife asked me if I was going to keep the Lone Star 2x12 combo when I told her I could get the clean channel of the Mark VII pretty close.

I said I can't carry it across the room, let alone up the stairs to give it to UPS!
 
I was curious so I asked Mesa if the 35 was discontinued and they confirmed it's still in production. I think Randall may be referring to the Black Taurus model that IS discontinued, they come with Black Bronco now.
 
Anyone spent time with the V and VII?

I’ll never sell my III but I’m wanting to have the option of having the Mark lead channel experience PLUS fully independent cleans and mid gain sounds. Both amps are tough to beat.

I’m leaning towards a V this winter but there’s been a VII sitting in a GC 40 miles north of me for at least 6 months now. If I could talk them down a bit I might chase it if it’s still there.

Rock Guitar GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy
 
I had a V a while back, and now the VII. They're both wonderful, but different, beasts.

The VII may have the edge for versatility. But that may not be required by a lot of players. Since the V is certainly a worthy amp, it's one of those 'play 'em both and decide' kind of deals.
 
I prefer the V over the VII by a large margin.
I'd never knock the V. It's a great amp.

Today I was able to set up three pretty wonderful clean to semi clean tones on the VII, one in each channel; then easily dial in sounds with lots of gain. For things like that, as much as I like the V, the VII is more my jam.

I figure there is no 'best' instrument, there's only what's best for each player. Rock on!
 
I seriously doubt that the V and VII are THAT far apart, tonally. The VII is a bit more flexible, but I bet the core tones aren't hugely different. You're really not going to struggle to get great tones out of either of them.

I kinda wanna get another Mark at some point myself. Absolutely love my Mark V.
 
I seriously doubt that the V and VII are THAT far apart, tonally. The VII is a bit more flexible, but I bet the core tones aren't hugely different. You're really not going to struggle to get great tones out of either of them.

I kinda wanna get another Mark at some point myself. Absolutely love my Mark V.
Less of a tonal question, more of a question of utility with the way the 9 modes are distributed across the 3 channels.

As I’m window shopping I’m realizing I have a similar issue with both amps where I really want the higher gain Mark lead modes available on ch2 & 3.
 
Less of a tonal question, more of a question of utility with the way the 9 modes are distributed across the 3 channels.

As I’m window shopping I’m realizing I have a similar issue with both amps where I really want the higher gain Mark lead modes available on ch2 & 3.
If I had the Mark VII I'd run:

Channel 1 - FAT or Crunch
Channel 2 - Crunch or MKVII
Channel 3 - MKIV or IIC

Every mode on the MKVII looks useful. Whereas all modes on the Mark V are great, except imho the Mark I mode on channel 2 - I just can't get it to sound good without destroying the GEQ settings for the other channels.

Thinking about it, that's the only thing about the Mark V I'm not digging - that one mode. It can sound good if you put an EQ in the FX loop, and switch it in and out whenever you select that channel.

Mark VII also has midi, which is really cool. It also has the ability to be rackmountable, and for fucksake, I really want one now. lmao.
 
1755338124565.png

1755338137632.png

 
Back
Top