paisleywookiee
Goatlord
- Messages
- 10,172
Of course it was a big mistake. But offering them anyway, whilst fully disclosing that fact (which they did; I received the email) isn't remotely unethical. Had they shipped them with it missing, THAT would have been unethical. But as it happened, I didn't even lose my place in line. As soon as the corrected units shipped very shortly after, I got mine with the jack. It wasn't 5 years.I'd call that fairly fucked. A batch of 1000 units (just to pull a number out of my ass) missing the headphone jack is a collosal fucking mistake that should never have happened, in all honesty. I'm sure Cliff was absolutely raging at the dumb fuck who made that mistake.
Offering them anyway is a way to ensure you recoup the cost of BOM. Whether that is an ethical way of dealing with it or not, that's in the eye of the beholder.
A lot of other companies who did a similar mistake would recall the units, or otherwise ensure that the end user never experienced the issue.
Between the two... I'm picking waiting 5 years to be able to load a plugin, versus a hardware problem that AS A USER I CAN NEVER FUCKING FIX!
I still don't agree that it equates in any way with NDSP over-promising and under-delivering for half a decade.

